Nine stellar fields for TOI-6130 in the 22 October 2026 archive match the source values for TOI-6016

We compare ten stellar fields for four hosts in the NASA Exoplanet Archive PS table with Table 8 of Ehrhardt et al. (2024). We use the default confirmed records retrieved on 22 October 2026. Nine fields for TOI-6130 match the source column for TOI-6016 and differ from the source column for TOI-6130. They include eight numerical values and the spectral class. All numerical errors also match after conversion of luminosity to log units. Each of the other three hosts matches its own source in all ten fields. The planet period, semi-major axis, mass, radius and radial velocity amplitude agree with Table 9 for all four planets. At fixed planet to star radius ratio, the wrong stellar radius would increase a new planet radius calculation by 30.2%. At fixed orbital distance, the wrong luminosity would increase calculated incident flux by 87.7%. These are conditional effects, not corrections to the published planet values. We also revisit a previously reported Kepler consistency issue. Both tested stellar mass choices give sensitivity ranges that contain the listed period. The source column match identifies an archive source association error; it does not show an unusual orbit. The package preserves the archive snapshot, source facts, provenance, comparison tables, figures, code and independent numerical checks. The finding applies to the tested fields and snapshot, not to an archive error rate.

TOI-6130 · TOI-6016 · NASA Exoplanet Archive · stellar parameters · source audit · data provenance · exoplanets · reproducible research