sciscape Publications
← All publications

A constant period fits 127 HAT-P-23 b timing rows from 2008 to 2024 with the stated errors

We tested smooth period change in the hot Jupiter HAT-P-23 b. We measured 56 transit times from public 120-second TESS light curves in sectors 54, 55, and 81. Coverage rules rejected 11 incomplete windows before timing fits. We combined the times with a fixed 71-row historical table. The fitted period change is +0.59 ± 1.36 milliseconds per year under the primary timing errors. The two-sided Gaussian 95% interval is −2.08 to +3.25 milliseconds per year. BIC for the quadratic clock exceeds BIC for the linear clock by 4.66. The 15 events in 2024 agree with the historical linear prediction: their mean difference is −17.7 ± 18.8 seconds, including clock uncertainty. Flux, transit-shape, and trial common-error tests also favor a constant period. The formal period-change error falls by 26% relative to the fixed historical sample, but its lower interval endpoint does not give a stronger decay bound. Removal of the large early source group greatly weakens the constraint. Earlier TESS surveys also found no clear period change. This work adds an independent timing set, a forecast test, and explicit noise controls. The package preserves raw inputs, hashes, selection records, code, covariances, figures, and offline run instructions. The result depends on the historical sample and tested errors. It does not establish orbital decay or a new planet.

HAT-P-23 b · TESS · transit timing · orbital period · orbital decay · reproducible analysis

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

10
  1. usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stae2062

    We use its versioned historical timing table and reference clock. Our historical fit reproduces its rounded period-change result.

  2. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244280

    We use its transit shape in a timing control and compare with its ground timing study.

  3. usesdoi:10.32023/0001-5237/68.4.4

    Its remeasured early times form a large part of the fixed historical compilation.

  4. usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stac592

    We inspect its timing flags and conversion checks. Two of its times are in the fixed compilation.

  5. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab7374

    Three of its times are in the fixed historical compilation.

  6. usesdoi:10.1016/j.newast.2020.101477

    Its separate telescope times are in the fixed compilation. We inspect repeated epochs and activity context.

  7. supportsdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.17225

    It reports no clear period change for this system in an earlier TESS survey.

  8. supportsdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.18355

    It reports no clear period change for this system in a later TESS survey. We do not claim first use of the 2024 visit.

  9. usesdoi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    We use public TESS observations from MAST.

  10. usesdoi:10.1086/683602

    We use batman to fit exposure-integrated transit templates.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.