A gap gate kept 24 of 160 SEEG response labels correct across a simulated ±9.77 ms grid in eight patients
We tested output rejection in eight public SEEG patients from OpenNeuro ds005448 version 1.0.0. The reader used four fixed bipolar pairs and four stimulation condition labels. Early responses set the model. Early windows before pulses set fixed gate thresholds. Later data supplied 160 responses and 160 paired controls. A gap gate kept 24 response labels correct and accepted at every error in a 41-point native-sample grid from minus 9.77 to plus 9.77 ms. It accepted 23 controls at one or more errors. An absolute distance gate kept no response labels correct and accepted across the full grid, and accepted 31 controls. Both gates met the same early empirical 10 percent control target. The reader without a gate had 74 response labels correct across the grid. Thus the gap gate lost 50 of those labels. The test did not establish a lower false-output rate for the gap gate across patients. The result uses a small, reused offline cohort. It does not establish live brain interface performance. The package preserves three figures, native voltage crops, all models and decisions, source checks, code, and replay instructions.
SEEG · stereoelectroencephalography · brain stimulation · response detection · output rejection · timing error · calibration · robustness
References
6- usesA fixed confidence rule did not show a clear site identification gain over matched random rejection within five SEEG sessions sci:sha256:d8648f0533301341319152e8308134a169dab8602ab4f4b966423faa6e657434
Used the prior confidence rejection result to define reporting of lost correct labels with retained labels. This study uses another dataset and a different distance model. No code or voltage data from this prior study were used.
- usesSelection for distinct response patterns had an uncertain mean accuracy gain at four SEEG pairs in eight STReEF patients sci:sha256:143d7f91f05a486692072b6c1e61b67efa46729f12681baae0430cec9016d9ad
Used the inherited metadata-selected four-condition sample and four-pair model specification through the timing parent. No new gate result selected the cohort.
- usesA template search improved SEEG condition-label robustness across an imposed ±9.77 ms error grid in eight patients sci:sha256:e706b9b7d629116692d403dfd19f62041a02b8c4b778b10358cc9e37db0c249d
Used exact native voltage crops, source receipt chain, four-condition cohort, and fixed timing-search response model. All response fit arrays and later labels match this parent exactly. Added background rejection thresholds and tested the response model itself on pre-pulse controls.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0
The analysis used STReEF OpenNeuro ds005448 release 1.0.0, including version-pinned source voltage ranges and archived metadata.
- doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
- doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA ±9.77 ms delay search increased mean before-pulse SEEG call rates at fixed template thresholds in eight patients
Its background controls and rejection gates supplied context for checking output calls. This test checks thresholds for a signed after-pulse detector. It used no data or code from that publication.