sciscape Publications
← All publications

A selected delay coefficient gives lower mean test rank agreement in four splits of 102 ds000030 controls.

Across 500 paired partitions of 102 OpenNeuro ds000030 control participants, selecting a common stop-signal delay coefficient on 51 participants increased mean training rank agreement in all four task splits, but gave a negative mean test change in each split compared with coefficient 1. Mean test changes ranged from -0.001923620 to -0.033355023. Some test directions were positive; these partition quantiles are not confidence intervals and do not support a population confidence claim. Each half had 16 STOP trials, and all partitions came from one cohort. The analysis used a 1,001-value coefficient grid and fixed full-run screens. The result does not establish physical sound timing or explain the lower test agreement. A separate session or cohort with actual sound-time records remains necessary.

stop-signal task · stop-signal reaction time · rank agreement · Spearman correlation · delay coefficient · split-half reliability · participant partition · OpenNeuro ds000030

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesIn 102 ds000030 controls, three of four task splits have maximum rank correlations more than the two zero-delay endpoint values. sci:sha256:4e4f4bee556d18440bc21414d227740f1374e3cfbd42be86c8991f1db1e70ecf

    The coefficient family, four task splits, and exact reference score table enabled this participant selection test.

  2. usesRecorded delays give lower rank agreement in 9,995 complete random splits of 102 ds000030 control runs. sci:sha256:0deab94852e4b22065210c13713255a88c29f8f47ec203f1f8ac078f468c2204

    The full-run sample screens and endpoint definitions fixed the 102-participant sample and the reference calculation.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    This is the recorded dataset, exact version, and source used for the 102 control participants.

  4. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
  5. doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01948-3
  6. doi:10.7554/eLife.46323

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.