Full confidence fitting lowered mean Brier score by 0.00016 against an offset update for joint 4–10 and 4–8 Hz phase success in seven later SEEG rest records
We tested confidence in fixed SEEG phase forecasts from 28 contact pairs in seven people. The data came from OpenNeuro ds006065 1.0.0. Main success required error at most 45 degrees against both offline 4–10 Hz and 4–8 Hz references. Inputs used only past voltage. The target was about 50 ms after the input cutoff. Both confidence updates used earlier rest. The test used separate later rest. Full fitting lowered mean Brier score from 0.223832 to 0.223670 against an offset update. The mean gain was 0.000162. The person bootstrap 95% interval was -0.000029 to 0.000358. The sign-flip p value was 0.203. This does not establish an added mean benefit. The offset update reduced mean joint-event probability error from +8.79 to -0.10 percentage points. It preserved every quantile gate decision. A secondary 5–9 Hz test with the same band center gave a larger slope-fitting gain. The package preserves code, voltage inputs, fixed and new models, joint labels, two figures, results, and retrieval instructions. Full public source hashes and every retained sample were checked. The cohort is reused. The labels need future voltage. We did not test live stimulation, biological phase truth, or clinical benefit.
stereoelectroencephalography · theta phase · phase forecasting · confidence calibration · Brier score · brain-computer interfaces · offline phase reference
References
4- usesPast amplitude gates changed mean 4–8 versus 4–10 Hz phase agreement by -0.56 percentage points in first files from 36 SEEG patients sci:sha256:87eb4681c107463aff3312a19d86d557781a290cbcb5c8c88f3b26ba85f63cac
Its comparison of offline 4–8 Hz and 4–10 Hz references informed the question and the joint-event definition. This study uses another SEEG dataset and tests confidence updates rather than amplitude gates.
- usesAngle agreement lowered mean Brier score for fixed 50 ms forecasts of offline theta phase in seven later SEEG rest records sci:sha256:79c4814830e67c545a9eb09f92319b03396f8c3470681dd9f973f4bfaee3fa15
We used its 14 voltage archives, seven fixed model archives, numerical helper code, and pinned source retrieval code. We extended its single-reference confidence test to a joint phase event and compared an offset update with full fitting.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006065.v1.0.0
The analysis uses rest recordings from OpenNeuro ds006065 version 1.0.0.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-025-59417-7
This paper describes the source experiment and its before- and after-stimulation rest recordings.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.