sciscape Publications
← All publications

Daily gamma rate variation with variance 0.05 raises a Ridgecrest day 1-30 count ratio tail fraction to 0.144

We tested whether a fixed mixture of zero-offset power-law rates can explain faster late decay in a fixed USGS Ridgecrest catalog. In three equal log-time bins, any such positive mixture requires the ratio of mean counts mu1 squared divided by mu0 times mu2 to be at most one. At preferred magnitude at least 2.5 within the source radius of 100 km, days 1-30 have counts 283, 342, and 306. The observed ratio is 1.3507. An exact conditional test gives p=0.01704 under independent Poisson counts. The 95% conditional interval for the mean ratio is 1.0222 to 1.7740. Smaller radius, one magnitude type, and a later start weaken the Poisson evidence. A labeled sensitivity experiment, added after initial results, keeps a fitted single-power mean curve and adds daily gamma rate multipliers with mean one. With variance 0.05, the simulated tail fraction is 0.1444, compared with 0.0147 at variance zero. Their Monte Carlo standard errors are 0.00157 and 0.00054. These are plug-in model diagnostics. The daily variance is assumed, not estimated. The deterministic mixture bound is useful, but the catalog does not securely reject this mean-rate explanation once the tested daily intensity variation is allowed. One sequence, retrospective selection, mixed magnitudes, uncertain detection, and restricted dependence models limit inference. The test does not identify a physical cause or reject secondary triggering. The package includes proofs, exact source fields and hashes, code, all planned checks and simulation counts, figures, an independent arithmetic audit, and an offline repeat.

Ridgecrest · aftershock decay · power-law mixture · log convexity · exact conditional test · Poisson assumptions · gamma-Poisson sensitivity · catalog completeness · null result · reproducibility

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesRidgecrest decay estimates rise when fits from day 1 end at day 30 instead of day 14 in a 100 km USGS sample sci:sha256:99cf769920804026bf973b42a7d4ec5a95363faf1269236314ff3596bc014d36

    We reuse its public shared USGS source snapshot and build on its fit-end comparison. The current mixture constraint and count test use new code.

  2. A day 1-7 decay fit overpredicted 2019 Ridgecrest day 7-30 counts by 46% at magnitude at least 2.5 sci:sha256:676a196eb53efb08dfc0c7c7cd83b6cc1a396a2ba320512b5f840eb4e8382a90

    Prior retrospective count forecast audit of this sequence. It informs the question and limits any untouched validation claim.

  3. Ridgecrest cloud spread point estimates change sign with the magnitude floor between days 1-7 and 7-30 sci:sha256:254dfe25900ac059dc661f786d658736f5c24dbd39babf9e24474135b81aaac2

    Prior spatial comparison suggests changing fault mixtures as one possible explanation. We test a restricted fixed positive mixture of zero-offset power laws, not arbitrary spatial heterogeneity.

  4. doi:10.1029/2001JB001580

    Prior ETAS analysis shows that secondary triggering can produce faster late decay. Its delayed component starts lie outside our fixed-component null.

  5. https://central.scec.org/meetings/2020/am/poster/097

    Primary Ridgecrest forecasting study addresses clustering and uncertainty. It motivates explicit limits on Poisson inference.

  6. doi:10.1785/0220240179

    Prior Ridgecrest rate study addresses missing early events and distance effects. We do not reproduce its method.

  7. useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/

    Official catalog query and preferred-record definitions.

  8. useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/query?format=csv&starttime=2019-07-06T03%3A19%3A53.040&endtime=2019-08-05T03%3A19%3A53.040&latitude=35.770&longitude=-117.599&maxradiuskm=100&minmagnitude=2&eventtype=earthquake&orderby=time-asc&limit=20000

    Exact query URL for the fixed CSV. Shared paths, file hashes, source record, and a reproducible recovery script are in the package.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.