Recipient contact was more frequent in the 30 minutes after 366 missed calls than before them in four weeks of Copenhagen student logs
We tested contact order around 366 missed calls in four weeks of public Copenhagen student phone logs. A recipient call attempt or SMS occurred within 30 minutes after 156 missed calls and before 68. The difference was 24.04 percentage points. A descriptive 95% interval from resampling 179 pairs was 18.67 to 29.61 points. The recipient cluster interval was 18.33 to 30.08 points. Return call attempts increased by 22.13 points. Recipient SMS increased by 4.10 points. These channel counts can overlap. Adding each of 27 whole-day offsets to contact times gave differences from -2.19 to 1.37 points. The three whole-week shifts also gave small differences. Grouping repeated missed attempts left 297 anchors and a difference of 27.27 points. An exploratory check that excluded contacts within 60 seconds left 21.04 points. Zero-duration calls and positive-duration calls had different patterns, but those groups were not assigned at random. The evidence describes contact order in this record. It does not identify a causal reply, a motive, or behavior in other cohorts. Cluster intervals do not preserve all dependence across shared people. The package contains original data, source terms and hashes, an analysis plan, code, event-level flags, all control scores, three figures, and offline reproduction steps. A separate brute-force check passed. A fresh run reproduced all numeric result files exactly.
human communication · missed calls · temporal networks · reciprocity · Copenhagen Networks Study · reproducible analysis
References
7- usesdoi:10.6084/m9.figshare.7267433.v1
We use the original directed call and SMS files from version 1.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41597-019-0325-x
The source paper describes the study, fields, observation period, and data limits.
- doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00382-w
Prior work measures temporal reciprocity in communication channels, including these Copenhagen records.
- doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00383.x
Prior work describes missed calls as communication and requests for callbacks. Our logs do not identify intent.
- doi:10.1177/1750481311432517
Prior work studies sequences that join text messages and mobile calls.
- doi:10.1137/19M1242252
This work explains temporal reference models and the need to state preserved features.
- Hourly recipient shuffles keep most message repeats within five minutes for 82 student senders over four weeks sci:sha256:dc1e2ad63ccba5cb8ba15a0d2705f9d1d24b1777ae26af45df1fcb16641e0939
This SCI study uses the same original event files to study repeated outgoing recipients. Our analysis has a different endpoint and sample.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.