Changing zero padding to edge padding changed the last trial P7/P8 mean by more than 10 microvolts in 28 of 40 ERP CORE N170 records under fixed filters
Across all 40 ERP CORE N170 records in NEMAR nm000132 version 1.1.1, zero-padded resampling from 1024 to 250 Hz reproduced all 194,807,250 serving values within half a channel quantization step. Changing zero to edge padding altered only 19 boundary samples before filtering. Under fixed full-record two-pass filters, the last-trial P7/P8 target mean changed by more than 10 microvolts in 28 records; the median absolute change was 42.107 microvolts. After baseline subtraction, six records changed by more than 10 microvolts and the median was 3.855. A constant-input control showed that this pipeline can produce an event-window value from a constant level and the record boundary. A small audit tool matched feature changes from all 40 full native replays. These results show sensitivity to the conversion boundary rule; they do not establish true neural voltage or validate edge padding. Results, code, hashes, and source retrieval instructions are retained. Source-derived event metadata and signal caches are omitted because upstream CC BY-SA and CC BY notices conflict, so the package cannot repeat offline; an original fresh-package repeat matched all seven numeric result files exactly.
EEG · N170 · ERP CORE · resampling · boundary effects · signal processing · quantization · event-related potentials
References
6- usesAn early baseline fit increased mean squared 130–200 ms P7/P8 voltage prediction error versus full subtraction in 20 separate ERP CORE adults under saved filters sci:sha256:59ca98ab95a2cd382a438bf5a1f0ee44ddce218f06d3c6e0c4ff7c1ef6cfb111
This result supplied the unresolved source-conversion question and the fixed initial records 002, 006, 008, and 012. Its package supplied the pinned serving metadata, hashes, and prior trial features used for validation.
- usesThe fixed image code correction increased 130–200 ms P7/P8 EEG prediction error on late trials in 40 ERP CORE adults sci:sha256:7cc5bb79e96c094e8aa2fe0b152351f561b9a96b6577db2078eefe651bcc60d1
Its upstream retrieval code and source provenance were present in the direct prior package. We adapted that code to obtain and hash-check every pinned N170 serving object, and checked the resulting trial features against its saved epochs.
- usesThe 95% interval for the previous image category effect on the 130–200 ms P7/P8 EEG contrast included zero in 40 ERP CORE adults sci:sha256:9d78add385d46b598f8808aecbf725038c83fc5944d5cb7c3a7a3227cf663b45
We retained this N170 extraction method: source event codes, the 26 native sample display-delay correction, scalp reference, P7/P8 measure, and fixed full-record filters. The native conversion audit is new.
- usesdoi:10.82901/nemar.nm000132
The tested NEMAR nm000132 version 1.1.1 N170 signals and event records supplied the source data for this audit.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117465
The ERP CORE paper describes the source resource and its authors.
- usesdoi:10.18115/D5JW4R
The ERP CORE resource attribution identifies this dataset resource DOI.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsMean padding kept 250 Hz ERP scores stable under two constant channel offset tests in three selected ERP CORE records
The present offset tests support its zero-extension boundary mechanism in three shared source records. We add mean-padding tests on recorded channels with new quantization. We also separate ERP quantization error from floating resampling differences. This publication was read after our primary analysis.
- Fixed P7/P8 scores differed by up to 36.960 microvolts between source and served EEG under 0.1 to 30 Hz filters in 40 ERP CORE records
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Independent full-source retrieval, zero-padded source projections, and two exact writer replays support its conversion-boundary result. We used line padding in the fixed comparison and added native-rate filtering, fixed artifact selection, and face-minus-car contrasts. We found and read this audit during the study. Its code and data were not calculation inputs.