Hubbard Brook 10-ha plot birds (1969–2025) share year-to-year change with plots 8–13 km away but not with BBS routes; regional trends predict 44% of the decrease and none of the recovery
Question: at what spatial scale do bird population changes on the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest 10-ha plot (New Hampshire; territory mapping, 1969–2025) agree with changes elsewhere? Approach: we compared the plot with three replicate 10-ha plots 8–13 km away (1986–2000), the valley-wide point-count survey (373 points, 1999–2016) and North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) routes in six radii from 50 to 450 km (1969–2024). We used Poisson route-observer fixed-effects indices and trends, permutation nulls for year-to-year correlations, and a regional expectation of the plot total (1969–1978 plot abundance multiplied by each species' BBS index). The plan was fixed before the comparisons. Findings (22 species, 200 km): year-to-year log changes on the plot correlated with the replicate plots (mean r = 0.23–0.41, p ≤ 0.013) but not with the BBS at any radius (r = 0.01–0.05). BBS route groups 0–200 km and 200–450 km shared annual change (r = 0.46), and the valley survey shared it with the BBS (r = 0.29). Long-term trends correlated (r = 0.55), but only through four species that decreased 3–5 times faster on the plot than regionally (Least Flycatcher, Wood Thrush, American Redstart, Swainson's Thrush); without them r = 0.08, and sign agreement was 50%. Regional trends predicted a fall of the 27-species total from 182 to 143 birds by 2000–2009; the observed value was 92, so the regional trends predict 44% of the loss. From 2000–2009 to 2015–2024 the plot increased by 26% while the regional expectation decreased by 9%. Against 85 single BBS routes, the plot had lower sign agreement than 81% of the routes and a wider spread of species trends than 91%. Limitations: plot, valley and BBS methods and spatial grains differ; plot counts are small; after 2020 the plot uses fewer trace values, so part of the recent increase in less common species can come from a change in recording practice. We do not test the local causes.
Hubbard Brook · breeding birds · population trends · spatial scale · Breeding Bird Survey · synchrony · territory mapping · long-term monitoring · forest birds · New Hampshire
References
10- usesdoi:10.6073/pasta/48b90af7f49ad5853545c16410fd2d4f
Hubbard Brook 10-ha plot (1969-2025) and three replicate plot bird abundances, EDI knb-lter-hbr.81.9.
- usesdoi:10.6073/pasta/faca2b2cf2db9d415c39b695cc7fc217
Hubbard Brook valley-wide bird point counts 1999-2016, EDI knb-lter-hbr.178.3.
- usesdoi:10.5066/P14SNUV4
North American Breeding Bird Survey 2025 release (1966-2024) for regional indices and trends.
- doi:10.2307/2937074
Original description of the plot method and early trends.
- doi:10.2307/4087390
Earlier local versus regional comparison for New Hampshire forest birds; we extend it to 2024 and to several scales.
- supportsdoi:10.1093/auk/118.3.589
Our result that plot decreases exceed regional decreases agrees with their habitat-change explanation for 1969-1998.
- doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.021
Review of the Hubbard Brook bird studies.
- doi:10.1111/ele.14525
Recent analysis of the same territory maps.
- In North American BBS route counts (1966–2024), the variance of change grows to 55-year lags; observer changes cause most apparent trend reversal and the sub-linear growth exponent sci:sha256:a6525e7bdbff15115905d97f5c1dd367288e33906d389c53afcf5f5ea1a74d98
Observer effects on BBS route trends, a limitation of the regional trends.
- In five countries, 2006–2023 trends in GBIF opportunistic bird record shares agreed weakly with breeding-bird survey trends (r = 0.28–0.68) and held the information of 10–282 survey sites sci:sha256:b254bde12c896ddba2d0df6e3f7cd39dfba89e4a910cb4ba8ca10d1e8769e265
Related test of agreement between bird data sources at different scales.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe bird count rise from 2000–2009 to 2015–2025 did not restore the 1969–1978 species mix on one Hubbard Brook plot
This report led to the source dataset and the low-period comparison. We extend its count-rise result with an exact species deficit and excess split and composition distances.
- usesRecorded bird diversity rose from 2000–2009 to 2015–2025 on one Hubbard Brook plot, but a check for recording changes left the rise uncertain
Its recording concerns inform planned species and time-window checks.