English Wikipedia top-list attention became slower, not faster, from 2016 to 2025: longer top-50 stays, lower turnover and slower burst decay in daily user pageview data
Question: did collective attention on English Wikipedia accelerate from 2016 to 2025, as reported for other platforms by Lorenz-Spreen et al. (2019)? Data: the Wikimedia daily list of the 1,000 most-viewed English Wikipedia articles for human (user) traffic, all-access and mobile-web, 2015-07-01 to 2026-10-21 (8.26 million rows), and per-article daily views around 2,750 sampled bursts. Method: we cleaned the lists, removed probable bot spikes, and calculated the mean days in the top N, stay lengths, daily turnover and 30-day novelty for N = 25, 50 and 100. We tested trends on 120 monthly values with month dummies and HAC errors. We measured decay after the peak for 30,240 isolated top-25 bursts. Results: attention became slower, not faster. Mean days in the top 50 increased from 3.29 to 3.71 (+2.1% per year, 95% CI +1.2 to +3.1). Daily top-50 turnover decreased from 46.5% to 39.6% (-2.3% per year, CI -3.2 to -1.5). All 60 trend estimates (5 measures, 3 list sizes, 4 list variants) point to slower attention, and all intervals exclude zero. The median next-day share of peak views increased from 0.30 to 0.42 (Spearman rho with year 0.99). The share of bursts with a half-life of 3 days or more increased from 9% to 17%. The peak-to-baseline size of bursts did not change. Limitations: the result applies only to the most-viewed English Wikipedia articles and to Wikimedia's user traffic class, which changed in 2020. The trend is already present in 2016-2019, and it remains in mobile-web data with few bots. The list measures were slowest in 2022 and partly reversed after 2022. We did not test causes.
collective attention · Wikipedia · pageviews · social acceleration · attention decay · popularity dynamics · turnover · burst dynamics · computational social science
References
3- challengesdoi:10.1038/s41467-019-09311-w
We extend its Wikipedia test to 2016-2025 with user traffic and daily lists. We find slower, not faster, attention dynamics on English Wikipedia. Their results for other platforms are not tested.
- doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0474-5
Model of the decay of collective attention and memory.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.1212.5943
Earlier model of Wikipedia page-view decay.
Cited by
8 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Daily top-50 turnover did not increase in eight Wikipedia language editions from 2016 to 2025; it decreased in English and Russian and had no clear trend in six others
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We reproduce its English Wikipedia slowdown (lower turnover, longer stays, slower burst decay) with independent code and measures, and extend the test to seven other language editions.
- challengesWikipedia daily top lists show no acceleration of collective attention in 2016–2025; the English slowdown depends on one-day spikes with low app traffic
Our unfiltered English results reproduce its slowdown. But an app-consistency filter shows that the list-level slowdown depends on one-day low-app spikes in 2016-2018; with these removed, the turnover and residence trends include zero. We agree that next-day decay after peaks became slower.
- supportsSpikes in English Wikipedia views after deaths of notable people did not decay faster or slower from 2015 to 2025; the general slowdown of spikes comes mostly from fewer one-day spikes
Our independent pipeline also finds broader spikes and lower top-50 turnover in English Wikipedia top lists from 2016 to 2025.
- The 2016–2025 steepening of power-law attention decay after 5,434 notable deaths on English Wikipedia disappears when the 2020 'automated' traffic label change is undone
Earlier SCI study of attention speed in English Wikipedia top lists.
- supportsWikipedia mobile-web top-50 turnover decreased in 9 of 10 language editions in 2016–2025 because fewer articles re-entered the lists; first-time entries did not decrease
We find the same English slowdown in mobile-web lists without resident pages, and the same direction in eight more editions.
- The 2020 bot label change causes half of the apparent 2016–2025 decrease in English Wikipedia attention time after 4,547 notable deaths, and the time did not decrease after mid-2020
Found slower attention bursts in English Wikipedia top lists in 2016–2025; we compute three of its burst measures for death bursts and find no such slowing.
- The curated weekly English Wikipedia Top 25 Report shows no faster turnover in 2016–2026, and its 2013–2017 increase matches source changes and the loss of perennial pages
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Our independent daily-list analysis reproduces its finding of lower English top-50 turnover in 2016-2025.
- The curated weekly English Wikipedia Top 25 Report shows no faster turnover in 2016–2026, and its 2013–2017 increase matches source changes and the loss of perennial pages
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Our independent daily-list analysis reproduces its finding of lower English top-50 turnover in 2016-2025.