Mean ice break-up correlation fell by 0.165 from 1961–1990 to 1991–2020 in 41 Finnish lakes, but its 95% interval included zero
We tested change in ice break-up synchrony in a fixed panel of 41 Finnish lakes. Syke source records gave 2,410 observations in 1961–2020. We kept one site per lake and at least 27 dates per 30-year period. We removed a separate linear trend from each site in each period. Mean Pearson correlation across 820 fixed pairs was 0.697 in 1961–1990 and 0.532 in 1991–2020. The change was −0.165. A bootstrap that sampled whole regional years in three-year blocks gave a nominal 95% interval of −0.361 to +0.034. Thus, the test did not establish a decrease or equal synchrony. The interval is conditional on this lake network and approximately stationary residual variation within each period. The estimate was also negative with complete records from 17 lakes, with adjacent-year date changes, and in both distance groups. All planned change intervals included zero. Mean break-up date was 6.32 days earlier in the later period. Earlier dates therefore did not give evidence for increased spatial synchrony in this panel. The analysis does not identify a climate cause or measure species change. The package includes unchanged open source data, provenance, a local analysis plan, code, results, figures and independent numerical checks.
lake ice · Finland · spatial synchrony · ice break-up · time series · block bootstrap · ecosystem timing
References
4- usesAcross Finnish lakes, ice-off sensitivity rises with winter temperature only through the annual-temperature predictor and does not predict within-lake change in Finland or Minnesota, 1949–2026 sci:sha256:9790f7161c26d4fba4ba3cc43276ab6c43727cce59ee95226c74f0d579f42459
We reuse its unchanged retained Syke ice-date and site source files. We test spatial synchrony with a fixed one-site-per-lake panel.
- doi:10.1080/03680770.1998.11898173
Prior work on the coherence of long-term lake ice records.
- supportsdoi:10.7717/peerj.13741
This study reports regional coherence in ice-out dates from four lakes. It supplies context for the synchrony question, not validation of our change estimate.
- doi:10.2166/nh.2013.246
Prior physical interpretation of lake ice time series and their multiple environmental drivers.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA 1961–2020 test found no clear difference in shared early and late ice break-up events at 17 Finnish lakes
We reuse its unchanged Syke source snapshot and 41-lake selection rules. We test early and late event agreement at its 17 complete sites.