Mean social choice rates had higher correlations between two runs in one visit than friend-minus-stranger rates in 84 ds005123 adults
We used the trust task in OpenNeuro ds005123 version 1.1.3. Of 114 adults, 84 passed the file and response checks. Each score gave the six offer pairs equal weight. The mean of friend and stranger high-choice rates had a Pearson correlation of 0.883 between two runs. The friend-minus-stranger rate had a correlation of 0.701. The correlation difference was 0.181. Its paired participant bootstrap 95% interval was 0.071 to 0.335, from 40,000 samples. All three planned checks gave positive differences. Both runs were in one visit. The two scores measure different features. Stability between visits remains untested. The package contains fixed source files, hashes, code, results, and instructions.
trust · social choice · test-retest reliability · measurement · Pearson correlation · intraclass correlation · bootstrap · OpenNeuro · ds005123
References
3- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005123.v1.1.3
The analysis uses the trust event files and original task logs from the recorded OpenNeuro ds005123 version 1.1.3. The source files, hashes, and retrieval records are preserved.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.dib.2024.110810
This is the dataset paper identified by the dataset record and its original README.
- doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe 95% interval for feedback gain included zero in 84 ds005123 adults with run 1 to run 2 logistic prediction and penalty 1
This study reused the 84-person sample rule, fixed source manifests, source files, and three inspected scripts. It rebuilt the same sample. It then tested extra prediction from past displayed partner feedback.