sciscape Publications
← All publications

REML gives median AR(1) estimates from -0.0134 to 0.0302 in six ds000102 runs.

This analysis compares lag-one correlation in ordinary least squares residuals with maximum likelihood (ML) and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimates under an exact stationary Gaussian AR(1) model. It uses 64 selected voxels from each of six public ds000102 runs and a primary mean model with trial, drift, and motion terms. The six REML medians range from -0.013440 to 0.030169; five are positive, while all six residual-correlation medians are negative. In 2,000 synthetic series generated under the stated design and AR(1) assumptions, REML has smaller absolute mean bias and root mean square error than residual correlation and ML at all four tested input values. This is a narrow comparison in three selected participants. The measured input covariance is unknown. The model assumptions may be incorrect, and these results do not establish noise independence, biological causality, or correct task inference.

restricted maximum likelihood · REML · AR(1) · fMRI · residual covariance · noise estimation · synthetic simulation

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesThe task estimates have median absolute differences of 0.558 to 0.624 percentage points in three raw ds000102 run-2 images. sci:sha256:8713c5a50539140ac71d788c2775ebe83256d9d0ce4b43885f69ca8d21c31403

    This work uses the intensity mask and 64-voxel selection rule. It checks the selection against six source raw images.

  2. usesSerial correlation increases the median variance cost of label-robust common-amplitude weights sci:sha256:93d49856d2fc80395597770feb2e6f3a84d10bd6761a525d35069d70be60f3b9

    This work uses the six measured samples, source manifest, full mean model, and residual correlation table. Fresh raw-image extraction checks each sample before the new likelihood analysis.

  3. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.002
  4. doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10474318

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.