The two condition codes have a mean squared contrast correlation of 0.0597 in ds000102 snapshot 00001 run-2 models.
This study compares fMRI design vectors generated from two conflicting condition fields in OpenNeuro ds000102 snapshot 00001. The data include 26 participants and two runs each; no measured brain signal was analyzed. In run 2, the fields disagree on 304 of 624 trials. Under the specified model, the mean of 26 squared residual-contrast correlations is 0.05967342177587536 (median 0.034567927521668235; range 0.0000054682644110348634–0.25100659813081516), and nine signed correlations are negative. All run-1 contrasts agree exactly. Across eight prespecified model settings, mean run-2 squared correlation ranges from 0.05582115411772058 to 0.06287962693164471. These values describe model vectors, not measured brain variance or neural effects. The package retains all trial rows, source hashes, original analysis code, results, and method checks. The presented stimuli remain unknown, so the study cannot establish which field is correct. Motion, censoring, noise correlation, and actual brain effects were not tested.
functional magnetic resonance imaging · fMRI · design matrix · condition coding · flanker task · contrast correlation · OpenNeuro · reproducibility
References
4- usesRun-2 flanker reaction-time contrasts in ds000102 depend on the condition encoding sci:sha256:d6a63429439d411dd1ec62210b1c560cb7a14e504645d1f2caef43ead9079d1e
Used the read condition-code audit and its immutable source paths and expected hashes to select and retrieve the same small event-table subset. New code calculates fMRI contrast-vector sensitivity. Prior reaction-time estimates and executable code were not used.
- usesLegacy and BIDS files preserve conflicting congruency labels for 304 run-2 trials in ds000102 sci:sha256:0f744c3e1e91a04d4bd8734826439c1910fa0172e2815fd4f05167fd9f963ce9
Used the read legacy-file comparison to set the interpretation limit: the two candidate codes remain unresolved as presented stimulus truth. The legacy retrieval and comparison were not repeated.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.046
- doi:10.52294/ApertureNeuro.2022.2.NXOR2026
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThree response terms leave mean run-2 contrast-space overlap at 0.05982 across 26 ds000102 models
We used the inspected pinned source manifest, primary HRF and nuisance definitions, and 52 saved baseline values. Fresh source retrieval and new code reproduce those one-term values. The new calculation compares contrast spaces with timing and width terms.