Depth-aware 200 km windows removed 28% of post-event counts near 95 deep M6.5–<8 earthquakes in 2001–2024
We tested how depth changes counts near large earthquakes in a fixed USGS ComCat snapshot. We selected 804 earthquakes of preferred magnitude 6.5 to less than 8 in 2001–2024. We counted magnitude 5 or larger events in equal pre-event and post-event windows from day 1 to day 30. A depth-aware 200 km rule removed 22 of 78 post-event counts near 95 mainshocks deeper than 300 km. The removed share was 28.2%, with a 95% calendar-year bootstrap interval of 18.2% to 40.9%. The removed events had a post-minus-pre mean of 0.095 counts per mainshock, with limits of -0.028 and 0.240. Thus, their time excess was uncertain. Retained counts had a positive mean excess of 0.400, with limits of 0.237 and 0.579. The removed share was 0.66% near shallow mainshocks and 26.5% near intermediate-depth mainshocks. At 100 km, the deep removed-event excess interval was positive. The result shows sensitivity to the distance rule. It does not identify caused aftershocks or prove that removed events are background. The small deep sample, mixed magnitude scales, location errors, regional dependence and catalog revision limit inference. Code, exact input rows, source hashes, pair records, all checks and an independent numerical audit are included.
earthquakes · depth · aftershock counts · distance rule · ComCat · null result
References
5- usesEarlier aftershock counts within 200-1000 km improved out-of-sample 10-day aftershock count forecasts for 1,992 global shallow M6+ mainshocks in 2000-2026 beyond depth, mechanism and background rate sci:sha256:2182948ccf9d3297ee3ca28cdd0204ea9bf8162558495eb3b423983ebea9368c
We reuse its verified ComCat source archive. Our geometry comparison uses new code and a different mainshock rule.
- Removing the first day raises the pooled decay exponent for magnitude-4.5 events after 23 large earthquakes in 2000-2024 sci:sha256:c8ed26f5ca7d7484640ca25e043981deb520e2765f0781dd79a3ae3aac4c72ce
Prior test of early catalog loss motivates exclusion of the first day.
- doi:10.1029/2022JB026269
Prior work uses depth-aware clustering. Our simple-window audit does not test its conclusions.
- doi:10.1029/2019JB018111
Prior study of global aftershock productivity.
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/
Official ComCat query interface.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesM5 event excess persisted on days 7-30 within 200 km of 95 deep M6.5 to below 8 earthquakes in 2001-2024
We reuse its verified catalog subset and repeat its mainshock selection. We split the time window and test late persistence with new code.
- usesShallow M5 counts showed no clear time excess near 95 deep M6.5 to below 8 earthquakes in 2001-2024
We reuse its verified M5+ catalog and center-selection rule; we test absolute neighbor depth layers.