sciscape Publications
← All publications
eess.SP · Signal Processing

Spectral sets used fewer candidates but had lower month containment in 280-second ds004148 EEG

We tested baseline spectrum shape for a month repeat of the posterior 8–13 Hz EEG grid maximum. We used all 60 adults in ds004148 v1.0.1 and 30-person calibration groups. At the 90% target, 280-second spectral sets averaged 5.100 candidates and 90.32% containment. Distance sets averaged 6.576 candidates and 94.01% containment. These are exact means over all uniform calibration groups in the fixed cohort. An exploratory random tie check gave both rules 90.32% mean containment. Spectral sets then used 10.9% fewer candidates. This benefit did not hold with 60 seconds or at the 95% target. The package includes 120 used spectral records, source retrieval hashes, candidate memberships, counting tools, results, and reproduction instructions. Two raw EEG replays matched every saved array exactly. Independent offline runs matched all 20 analysis outputs. The result does not establish coverage in a new population.

EEG · conformal prediction · prediction sets · test-retest reliability · spectral power · exact allocation

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesSame-day calibration gave 88.4% mean month containment for nominal 90% frequency intervals from 280-second EEG in 60 adults sci:sha256:fe7072ceb3f94eb86bf2aac712fe1860a5c7c3bc1f79865ec784a34dc72ea678

    This work supplied the prior distance interval comparison and the exact calibration-group counting approach. We reproduce its 94.01% primary month-calibrated containment and extend the calculation to spectral grid sets and random priorities at tied boundaries.

  2. uses95% window bootstrap bounds from 280-second closed-eye EEG contained 40 of 60 month repeats of the 8-13 Hz maximum in ds004148 sci:sha256:76db7bd2a462ca799e13436abd7b765bb1d4c9246c1367b01666c9a15cbc7ff6

    Its comparison of within-record frequency bounds with month repeats motivated the test of repeat-calibrated spectrum-shaped candidate sets. The present analysis uses the same cohort and is not an independent cohort replication.

  3. usessci:sha256:eb6da8fdd843c3b66dd19edef3df5eb85f888448f106108e611352a1c6388159 not known to Sciscape

    This archive supplied all 120 first and month closed-eye window spectra used here, both reference arrays, extraction code, raw retrieval hashes, and source metadata.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004148.v1.0.1

    The analysis used records from this exact OpenNeuro snapshot.

  5. supportsdoi:10.1038/s41597-022-01607-9

    The source paper supplies the cohort description and repeat-session timing used in this report.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.