The two-summer temperature difference predicted Swiss airborne beech pollen out of sample (1970-2022), and the pollen response to it increased as summers became warmer
Question: does the seed-based 'dT' cue for beech masting (June-July temperature of the previous summer minus that of the summer before) predict an independent measure of flowering, and did the response change as summers warmed? Approach: we used the MeteoSwiss national pollen network (14 stations, manual traps, 470 station-years, 1969-2022) and homogenized MeteoSwiss temperatures. We compared station-fixed-effect models out of sample with complete years held out, and we used six other pollen taxa as comparisons. Results: a dT model fitted on 1970-2002 decreased the 2003-2022 mean squared error of log10 annual beech pollen by 64% relative to the station mean; previous-summer temperature alone gave 4%, and previous-year pollen alone gave 22%. The reverse test gave 38% and leave-one-year-out gave 57%. dT gave no skill for oak, ash, birch, alder or grass; hazel had some skill. The beech slope on dT increased from 0.16 (1969-1989) to 0.34 (1990-2005) and 0.48 log10 per degree C (2006-2022); the decade interaction was +0.089 (SE 0.020). The year-to-year standard deviation was 2.2 times larger in 2006-2022 than in 1969-1989 (95% CI 1.7-2.7). From 1990 to 2022 there was no mean trend (-0.07 +/- 0.14 log10 per decade), as dT predicts, although summers warmed by 0.65 C per decade; low-dT years became lower. This is the opposite of the masting breakdown reported from seed data elsewhere. Automatic monitors (from 2023) gave a positive bias of +0.22 log10 and a compressed response. Because June-July 2026 was about 2 C warmer than 2025, the dT model predicts a strong beech pollen year in 2027 (+0.80 log10; +0.38 with a previous-year term). Limitations: pollen is not seed; early decades have few stations; undocumented changes in counting methods before 2023 cannot be excluded as a cause of the stronger later response.
mast seeding · Fagus sylvatica · airborne pollen · delta-T cue · climate change · Switzerland · MeteoSwiss · out-of-sample forecast · masting breakdown · observation bias · automatic pollen monitoring · phenology
References
8- supports, usesdoi:10.1111/ele.12020
Source of the differential-temperature (dT) cue that we test with pollen data.
- supportsdoi:10.1111/nph.14600
European beech seed study with T1/T2 and dT cues; our pollen data give the same equal-and-opposite form.
- challengesdoi:10.1111/gcb.17307
Reports masting breakdown with rising summer temperatures in seed data; Swiss beech pollen became more, not less, variable.
- challengeshttps://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/419364/climate-warming-causes-mast-seeding-to-break-down-by-reducing-sensitivity-to-weather-cues
Reports reduced sensitivity to weather cues with warming; the Swiss pollen response to dT increased.
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33812098/
Earlier trend analysis of the Swiss pollen network 1990-2020.
- useshttps://data.geo.admin.ch/api/stac/v1/collections/ch.meteoschweiz.ogd-pollen
MeteoSwiss pollen station data (Source: MeteoSwiss).
- useshttps://data.geo.admin.ch/api/stac/v1/collections/ch.meteoschweiz.ogd-nbcn
MeteoSwiss homogenized NBCN monthly temperature (Source: MeteoSwiss).
- https://opendatadocs.meteoswiss.ch/a-data-groundbased/a7-pollen-stations
MeteoSwiss documentation of the manual-to-automatic change on 1 January 2023.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsJanuary-February warmth slopes for tree pollen peak dates were uncertain in four eastern US samples in 2003-2024
Related campaign pollen study with Swiss summer cues and annual amount. No data or code reused.