Local forecasts reduced normalized joint limit width by 16.7 percent versus a mean at a 90 percent target for simulated 50 ms gaps in 215 SEEG records from seven people
In 215 later SEEG records from seven people with epilepsy, a local forecast gave narrower complete-gap limits than a fit mean. Each simulated gap had 20 native voltage values: two hippocampal channels and ten samples over 50 ms. A ten second fit and a separate nine second calibration interval set the predictor and limits before the test. At a 90 percent target, joint forecast limits covered 89.2 percent of complete gaps. Their normalized full width was 16.7 percent lower than the mean baseline width (descriptive 95 percent person bootstrap interval: 14.6 to 19.3 percent). The mean baseline covered 88.5 percent of gaps. Forecast limits set separately for each value covered 90.0 percent of values but only 44.1 percent of gaps. In 78 of 215 records, joint forecast coverage was below 90 percent. All six fixed calibration checks are reported. A 95 percent target with 18 calibration scores gave unbounded limits. This is an offline test on intact pre-stimulation voltage. It does not establish coverage during real stimulation. The conformal rank method is established and requires exchangeability for its probability claim. The package contains raw selected files, exact provenance, code, predictions, limits, tables, figures, and reproduction instructions.
split conformal prediction · prediction intervals · stereo-EEG · SEEG · brain-computer interface · signal forecasting · coverage · calibration
References
5- usesA 20-second median correction reduced error for a 10 percent beta threshold target in saved SEEG records from seven people sci:sha256:0ab6c409a66046bcd1ce14f9afb3c5e51588bbaa620f40f8d19b1e8991247965
This study uses the metadata selection rule, the EDF reader, and the exact-source retrieval code through the parent archive. A fresh check reconstructed the selection and matched every selected source file.
- supportsLimits set for 80% sample coverage covered zero of 36 complete test segments in nine offline SEEG readers sci:sha256:cbfaf8d212fe327b7d238e40e317d776375468cb0c9c2c71a7ea794ce265f672
This study gives another tested example of the coverage-unit problem. At a 90 percent target, separate limits covered 90.0 percent of native values but only 44.1 percent of complete 20-value SEEG gaps. Joint limits covered 89.2 percent of gaps. The task, targets, and source cohort differ from the earlier decoded-sequence study.
- usesA 20 second local fit reduced normalized forecast error for simulated 50 ms gaps in 215 later SEEG records from seven people sci:sha256:eb5cdcbf2550339c3dbf2565f0d8130d2a47ded48b54da9a6ff65fd0c5ca0000
This study uses the exact 222 selected raw records and source hashes from the local forecast study. It retains the 215 later-record population. It tests joint error limits after a new ten second fit and a separate calibration interval.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007095.v1.0.0
The analyzed voltage records and source metadata are from OpenNeuro ds007095 v1.0.0.
- doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1815732
Source data paper describing the RNS intracranial EEG dataset.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.