An exploratory 66-interval audit found a small race bound violation in 38 ds006780 TD records with equal context weights
This study tested an auditory-visual minimum race in 38 TD records from OpenNeuro ds006780 version 1.0.0. It used equal weights for six stimulus-history contexts and one family of 66 fixed intervals. The (150,225] ms interval had an audiovisual excess of 2.236 percentage points. Its simultaneous 95% bootstrap band was [0.080,4.393] percentage points. The 11 bounds with a fixed 100 ms left endpoint did not reject. The interval result remained after final trials were removed. It did not remain with nine equal contexts or trial pooling. An exact three-time example passed all classic cumulative bounds but could not be a minimum race with fixed channel distributions. The package includes its proof, a finite-grid solver, 140 source files, code, results, and reproduction instructions. An independent parser and a fresh-source replay passed. The empirical result is exploratory because the earlier study had already used these records and a related contrast. It does not establish a neural mechanism.
race model · audiovisual response · reaction time · interval bounds · context invariance · simultaneous confidence band · finite-grid solver · OpenNeuro
References
6- usesA test at 11 times did not reject the audiovisual race bound in 38 TD records from ds006780 v1.0.0 with a 100 ms cutoff sci:sha256:d6c712ff30c7f235566d2e208e2f6c8970a14576fa9d5521f3ee71a74dad3cab
This study used the source manifest, retrieval code, event parser, cohort, and deadlines from this report. It recovered the prior primary scores. It added one 66-interval family, an exact example, and a finite-grid solver. The records were the same, so this is not an independent data replication.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006780.v1.0.0
This study analyzes audiovisual response events from OpenNeuro ds006780 version 1.0.0; the dataset metadata records this exact version DOI and CC0 license.
- doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1170-0
- doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01141
- doi:10.3758/APP.72.3.839
- doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90010-X
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAn assumed 1.953 ms time error limit gave no positive approximate 95% bootstrap lower bound for 66 intervals in 38 ds006780 v1.0.0 TD records
This study used the earlier 38-person cohort, 66 endpoints pairs, trial rules, source package, source hashes, and reference arrays. It reproduced the zero-error result and added a test with bounded response time errors.