sciscape Publications
← All publications

Colder winters were followed by lower next-summer counts of resident birds than of migratory birds on 4,097 North American survey routes in 1967-2024, with same-observer route-year controls

Question: does the temperature of the preceding winter change next-summer bird counts more for species that stay at the route in winter than for species that leave it? Approach: we used North American Breeding Bird Survey counts (2025 release) and GHCN-CAMS monthly gridded temperature. The response was the change in log count of each species on each route from one year to the next, with the same observer in both years (4,927,559 pairs, 361 species, 4,097 routes). AVONET migration classes separated resident, partially migratory and migratory species. A route-year fixed effect absorbed all survey conditions shared by species (observer, date, weather, effort). Migratory species, which are absent in winter, were the negative control. Results: after a winter 1 C warmer than the 1981-2010 route mean, resident counts changed by 0.94% more than migratory counts (95% CI 0.72 to 1.17); partial migrants by 0.83% more (0.61 to 1.05). The migratory class slope alone was 0.17% per C (-0.05 to 0.39). Cold winters had larger effects than warm winters: after winters 3 C or more below normal, resident counts fell 5.0% (3.8 to 6.2) relative to migrants. The contrast was positive with a CI above zero in all six region-by-period samples (West, Central, East; 1967-1995, 1996-2024) and in all three winter-climate terciles. A placebo with the winter after the survey gave no contrast (0.12%, -0.19 to 0.43). About 60% of a one-winter change reversed in the next year. The contrast did not clearly change between periods. Limitations: BBS counts are indices and class-specific detectability changes cannot be fully excluded; AVONET classes are coarse and contain some errors; monthly 0.5 degree temperature does not capture snow, ice or the duration of cold spells.

Breeding Bird Survey · winter severity · weather extremes · migration strategy · negative control · observer bias · population change · GHCN-CAMS · AVONET · climate change · birds · North America

Admitted 3 citing publications

References

7
  1. useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/691cfb53d4be021d1d89b482

    North American Breeding Bird Survey 2025 release: counts, run data, routes and species list.

  2. useshttps://downloads.psl.noaa.gov/Datasets/ghcncams/air.mon.mean.nc

    GHCN-CAMS monthly gridded land temperature, used for route winter anomalies.

  3. usesdoi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16586228.v7

    AVONET Supplementary dataset 1, migration class for each species.

  4. doi:10.1111/ele.13898

    AVONET description (Tobias et al. 2022).

  5. A warm breeding season was followed by lower next-year counts in the warm part and higher counts in the cool part of 368 bird species ranges in North American surveys, 1970-2024 sci:sha256:3250b81c789d8cd041cf359eb978868b41ae06364686201fde41eeb105a326c8

    Campaign result on breeding-season warmth and next-year BBS counts; this study tests the preceding winter with a different design.

  6. Bird community temperature index followed less than 10% of May-July warming on 5,294 North American survey routes in 1970-2024 with route and observer controls sci:sha256:c0a3a9aa7b4c6115119528bcd43c4f51b7bc2de204c571e3c468161b72cf1b91

    Campaign result on BBS community temperature index and summer warming; related climate-bird work on the same survey.

  7. Ground-level ozone had no robust association with bird counts on 2,155 US Breeding Bird Survey routes from 1995 to 2024 in fixed-effects models with observer control sci:sha256:2603c41c0fe979d3cf70d08c3bdfb1b052386c2cee04f2e9e054d5c5fa10d6a2

    Campaign result with a null ozone link to BBS counts under observer control; this study uses a similar observer control for a weather exposure.

Cited by

3 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.