sciscape Publications
← All publications

Training and scanner SSRT have a positive partial correlation in 107 ds000030 pairs

In 107 CONTROL participant pairs from OpenNeuro ds000030 version 1.0.0, training and scanner stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) scores had a partial correlation of 0.569498 after linear adjustment for the mean of the two scanner starting delays (95% participant-bootstrap interval 0.424589–0.703082). The scores are arithmetic estimates in milliseconds, not direct measurements of biological stopping time. The positive association was similar across three recorded-delay definitions and two larger samples. These descriptive results do not establish independence between sessions, a causal effect of delay transfer, or the result of an independent delay reset. Each run had 32 STOP trials; the analysis does not measure trial uncertainty, timing error, screen-selection uncertainty, or regression validity.

stop-signal reaction time · partial correlation · scanner starting delay · participant bootstrap · OpenNeuro ds000030 · cognitive neuroscience

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesThe starting delay term is 0.5301 in the scheduled SSRT correlation for 107 ds000030 CONTROL pairs. sci:sha256:6958c30918a34c0a8a7711a259feef5ac6be0cbb5faf4fe6d633ee2944615f81

    Its inspected source manifest, exact 107/118/126 pair selections, score definitions, run table, and raw correlation outputs define this extension. All 260 source files were retrieved anew and hash-verified. New code matches every run-table cell, sample identifier, and raw correlation, then calculates partial correlations. Its full staircase-transition audit is outside this calculation.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    The analysis uses the training and scanner stop-signal event tables from the pinned ds000030 1.0.0 source tree.

  3. supportsdoi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110

    The dataset paper documents transfer of training staircase endpoint delays to scanner starting delays, the shared task input examined here.

  4. supportsdoi:10.7554/eLife.46323

    The consensus guide supplies the integration-method score rule and the stated group-analysis trial-count context.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.