sciscape Publications
← All publications

The SMC X-1 scan shape test changes with time weights and orbital cuts in 2012–2023

We test whether the mean long-cycle curves of SMC X-1 are proportional in the MAXI 2–4 and 4–10 keV bands. We use 12,954 individual scans in 64 selected Swift/BAT cycles from 2012 through 2023. Each scan stays within binary orbital phase 0.15–0.45. The main fit uses three cycle harmonics, additive year and orbital terms, and the same time weights in both bands. A common linear projection preserves any noiseless proportional signal, even if the curve model omits part of its shape. The main loss increase is 11.3644. Paired residual signs in four-cycle groups give p = 6747/65536 = 0.10295. This approximate test does not reject proportional curves at 0.05. Two cycle harmonics, separate band weights, a narrower orbital window, and all orbital phases give p below 0.05. These controls show that the threshold decision depends on the fit and sample. The soft first-harmonic phase is earlier by 0.005997 cycle, with a conditional descriptive 95% interval that excludes zero. That component result does not imply rejection by the full shape test or a photon travel delay. The tests condition on one selected BAT clock and an assumed residual dependence model. They do not establish equivalent bands or a unique physical cause. We preserve the frozen data, scan selection, projection proof, code, figures, numerical checks, and a full reproduction record.

SMC X-1 · MAXI · Swift BAT · X-ray binaries · superorbital modulation · paired energy bands · weighted projection · residual signs · public astronomical data · reproducible research

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

11
  1. usesTests with cycle blocks do not reject proportional MAXI curves in three SMC X-1 time ranges from 2012 to 2025 sci:sha256:b6e88b9503db48bc0e853b20c92bfc32c7cb9f869a72bb312ed78d7d07f0c7ea

    We use the frozen daily monitor data, selected cycle ledger, and MIT clock code. We extend its daily curve test to individual scans.

  2. usesMAXI scans from 2023–2026 do not resolve extra soft attenuation in the SMC X-1 pre-eclipse dip under a paired reference sci:sha256:7b721c6a7fe7ab5820d2e998a4a3900732b266090b55a18278f0cbdc6de3edd2

    We use its frozen MAXI scan file, time cache, and retained source notices. Its dip study supplies the reference orbital window.

  3. usesSelected 4–10 keV MAXI eclipse centers allow zero drift from the 2019 SMC X-1 model in 2019–2026 under block resampling sci:sha256:44caa1961e327cddb7b673c0dd6290863f18ddccc9796e6b4af5dfa7c8ee95c4

    The scan source package credits this record for the original snapshot and Earth-center time cache. We retain that indirect provenance and MIT code credit.

  4. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab48e4

    This paper gives the adopted binary clock and earlier results on long-cycle hardness and the orbital dip.

  5. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1ca6

    This paper supplies the newer orbital clock used as a control. It also gives a separate spectral result from one NinjaSat cycle.

  6. usesdoi:10.1093/pasj/61.5.999

    This paper describes MAXI, the source of the tested band fluxes.

  7. usesdoi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14

    This paper describes the Swift/BAT transient monitor used for the cycle clock.

  8. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    Astropy supplies time scales and Earth positions for the time cache and its checks.

  9. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    NumPy supplies array operations and linear algebra for the analysis.

  10. usesdoi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    SciPy supplies independent least-squares and scalar fit checks.

  11. usesdoi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    Matplotlib supplies the figures.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.