Two transit models with quadratic baselines give KELT-9 b mean times 42–53 seconds apart in six TESS sectors
We fit 88 KELT-9 b transits in six public TESS sectors from 2019 to 2024. Each event has a symmetric fit and an asymmetric fit. Both fits use the same data and free quadratic baselines. Center, width, edge scale, curvature, and depth are free. The symmetric model gives earlier sector mean times by 42.48 to 52.50 seconds. The paired time difference has a fitted slope of -0.76 seconds per year. Its conditional 95% Student t interval is -2.76 to +1.25 seconds per year. This interval assumes a linear mean and independent Gaussian sector errors with equal variance. The 2024 mean difference is 3.78 seconds below the 2019 mean difference. A paired event bootstrap gives a 95% interval from -11.86 to +4.28 seconds for this change. The test does not resolve a change in the difference. A control with fixed stellar pulse terms reduces the sector offsets to 26–32 seconds. An SAP-flux control gives a negative end difference under event resampling. Its sector trend interval includes zero. These intervals use different error assumptions. With symmetric synthetic inputs, the nominal 95% sector interval contains zero in 93.83% of finite-pool draws. These results compare two specified empirical profiles. Neither center is assumed to give true orbital conjunction. The package includes model controls, synthetic recovery tests, all source files, provenance, event measurements, code, figures, and repeat instructions. It extends an earlier SCI width study with a paired timing dataset. It does not establish orbital decay or a unique physical cause.
KELT-9 b · TESS · transit timing · transit asymmetry · model sensitivity · reproducible astronomy · public data
References
8- usesLocal fits to six TESS sectors show smaller KELT-9 b transit widths from 2019 to 2024 sci:sha256:d8ecadc9016b325bcfb3f4e32394b59c10aa069839676c80c12281461b07465d
We reuse its six unchanged public FITS files, archive provenance, data selection, and empirical profile code. This contribution adds paired timing fits and recovery tests.
- usesdoi:10.17909/t9-nmc8-f686
NASA, TESS, SPOC, and MAST supply the six public 120-second light curves. The saved file hashes define the source snapshot.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab8fa3
This study established the gravity-darkened asymmetric transit. It gives the physical context for comparing timing models.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6b9a
This study measured nodal precession. It limits claims of new physical knowledge from later transit profile changes.
- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244529
This earlier KELT-9 b timing study gives context for a test of model-dependent transit times.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.01446
This timing study uses symmetric transit profiles and discusses KELT-9 b asymmetry. The source ephemeris locates our event windows; each fitted center remains free.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/aba2cb
We use its 7.58695-hour period for a fixed sine and cosine control.
- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243823
We use its 0.3386-day period for a second fixed sine and cosine control. This control does not repeat its Gaussian process model.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Fits with free brightness give shorter KELT-9 b contact duration estimates in six TESS sectors from 2019 to 2024
Its catalog abstract reports differences between symmetric and asymmetric timing fits. This is context for the free asymmetric profiles used here. It is not a source of our duration measurements.