Peak frequency has a negative fitted phase slope in 104 CHIME bursts of FRB 20180916B with a linear time term
We tested whether fitted burst peak frequency is associated with activity phase inside the CHIME 400–800 MHz band. CHIME/FRB Catalog 2 release 20251231 gives 113 events for FRB 20180916B. Quality flags leave 104 events in 54 activity cycles from 2018 to 2023. Each event has one weight and uses its median component peak. With a 16.34-day reference period, fixed cycle counts, and a linear calendar-time term, the fitted slope is -1.142 days per frequency doubling. The nominal 95% cycle-cluster interval is -1.712 to -0.571 days. A model with separate cycle intercepts gives -1.637 days, with an interval of -2.847 to -0.427, from 77 events in 27 cycles. Whole-cycle bootstrap intervals are also negative. All 54 fits that remove one cycle have a negative slope. The raw rank correlation is weak, and the 20 events in 2022–2023 do not establish the trend alone. We prove that a linear time term makes the phase slope invariant to a trial period when reference cycle counts are kept. This property does not confirm the clock. The result extends a known association across observing bands to a measured-peak catalog test inside one band. It is exploratory and conditional on detection, the spectral fits, and the selected model. Beam response, exposure, and selection effects prevent an intrinsic activity-window or physical-mechanism claim. We preserve the event audit, provenance, code, results, figures, and reproduction instructions.
FRB 20180916B · CHIME/FRB Catalog 2 · fast radio bursts · activity phase · spectral peak · cycle clusters · period sensitivity · reproducible astronomy
References
6- usesdoi:10.11570/25.0066
We use Catalog 2 release 20251231 to build the event audit and fit measured peak frequency against phase for FRB 20180916B. The source CSV hash is preserved.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.09399
We use the Catalog 2 definitions of arrival time, spectral peak, and quality flags, and its instrument and selection caveats.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2307.05839
We use the 16.34-day reference period and MJD 58369.40 epoch. Section 3.5 found no obvious frequency-phase relation in a smaller baseband sample. Our catalog selection and peak summary differ; the observation periods overlap.
- doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03724-8
This prior study established earlier activity at higher observing bands. Our within-band conditional fit does not claim the first evidence of chromatic activity.
- doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556269
The 2026 study models activity across receiver bands and discusses the benefit of observed burst spectral extent. We use individual fitted peaks and one weight per event. We consulted arXiv:2507.04609v3.
- doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5b98
The 2026 uGMRT study reports local central-frequency variation near the middle of the activity window. This limits any claim that a single monotonic law applies to every band. We consulted arXiv:2409.20307v2.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- 113 CHIME bursts from FRB 20180916B need a window of at least 5.11 days for constant periods of 16.0 to 16.7 days
This SCI study uses the same catalog source for a spectral association and explains why its phase slope does not confirm a trial clock. The present work tests timing containment directly.
- A DM fit has positive curvature in 80 observed CHIME Catalog 2 days of FRB 20180916B with linear shape terms and independent 60-day blocks
The frequency and phase result for FRB 20180916B identifies a possible omitted variable. It does not test DM curvature.