Equal shaft weights changed top 10% hub replacement in both directions after one shaft omission in 1–80 Hz bipolar SEEG from 36 patients
We tested whether equal weights for electrode shafts reduce changes in SEEG hub labels after one shaft is omitted. We used two 60-second interictal records from each of 36 patients in OpenNeuro ds004100, version 1.1.3. The primary test used 1–80 Hz correlations between disjoint bipolar channels and a top 10% hub group. Mean hub replacement was 13.43% for standard strength and 12.59% for equal shaft weights. The paired difference was −0.84 percentage points, with a 95% patient bootstrap interval of [−2.04, +0.53]. Equal weights gave less replacement in 21 patients and more in 11. Across eight fixed settings, the mean difference was negative in three and positive in five. The results do not show a consistent reduction under this test. We preserved all maps, scores, hub lists, source range hashes, and code. Fresh public EDF data reproduced all 72 maps and every hub list. A separate scalar score check also passed. The test assesses stability in recorded channels. It does not establish clinical value.
stereoelectroencephalography · epilepsy · network hubs · electrode coverage · robustness · hub replacement
References
4- usesSpearman gave higher agreement than Pearson between 1–80 Hz bipolar SEEG maps in 18 patients and lower agreement in 18 patients sci:sha256:1c907a005b6735d29f467e29b03c8c661adda48f17e3a259c71b4ab4f94f1e6d
Used signed Pearson maps, disjoint bipolar channel definitions, the raw fixture, and EDF reconstruction code. The new test measures hub changes after one shaft is omitted.
- usesTwo bases of the same SEEG contrast space gave different 1–80 Hz correlation participation ratios in 36 patients sci:sha256:901bade82e1972a491fb8b27d87ddf5ae157f439c20fb612d6d24768419473f2
Used the original source selection, pinned EDF retrieval recipe, and copied EDF parser through the input map publication.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The analysis uses two interictal EDF excerpts from each of 36 patients in OpenNeuro ds004100, version 1.1.3.
- doi:10.1162/netn_a_00131
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.