Early validation selected zero SEEG correction in seven of 15 additional MetaRDK records
We tested a fixed confidence forecast in 15 additional MetaRDK SEEG records. Early trials fit models and selected zero correction or a ridge correction from eight signals. The test used 1,502 later trials. Mean squared error was 0.0311343 for task inputs and 0.0308216 after selected SEEG correction. The mean gain was 0.0003127, or 1.00%. The descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was -0.0000357 to 0.0007482; the exact sign-flip p value was 0.25. Three records improved, five worsened, and seven had zero correction. The early-mean constant forecast had less mean error than the selected forecast. Selection had less error than a forced penalty-10 correction in 13 of 15 records; this was a secondary check. All 537 main forecasts from the prior six records matched exactly. The package preserves two figures, all inputs and forecasts, model states, code, source versions, and retrieval steps. Fresh source checks rebuilt two records exactly. Source smoothing, normalization, sequential previous reports, and a future-click filter limit the result to this offline test. No stimulation benefit was tested.
SEEG · confidence forecasting · brain-computer interface · ridge regression · MetaRDK · forecast validation
References
4- Early validation selects zero SEEG correction for later confidence forecasts in four of six MetaRDK records sci:sha256:b03c1d1802e9e6214055e4c87f11dd9464218bf7cbef015db90d3f8fb303d8e0
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We kept the numerical confidence method fixed and matched all 537 prior marker-excluded main forecasts exactly. We then applied the same chronological selection method to the 15 other compact records. The primary 15-record estimate is kept separate from the prior six records.
- usesOffline SEEG readers with eight contact pairs and penalty 10 gave mean choice AUC 0.526 across opposite cues in 19 MetaRDK participants sci:sha256:c22d122d956476b6b42bf2d4ff09d54b02692d4e2c7e7005a613581a561a487f
We used all 21 unchanged compact SEEG records, the source behavior and anatomy metadata, the immutable source manifest, and the extraction and retrieval code. These inputs support the separate 15-record confidence test and six-record reproduction check.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006253.v1.0.3
The primary and reproduction analyses use compact records and source metadata from MetaRDK version 1.0.3.
- doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61744-8
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesSelected SEEG correction gave higher mean task error forecast loss in 15 additional offline MetaRDK tests
We used all 21 unchanged compact signal records, source behavior and anatomy metadata, source manifests and extraction receipts, and retrieval tools. We used these inputs for task error forecasts. We did not use the source confidence forecasts as error forecasts.