March windows contained more days after recorded cherry bloom at Liestal and Washington in 1988-2025 than in 1951-1987
We tested how much of a fixed March weather window falls after recorded peak cherry bloom. Three public site records supplied 225 complete site-years from 1951 to 2025. The later-minus-earlier mean count of March days after bloom was 2.03 at Liestal and 2.67 at Washington. Approximate block intervals adjusted for three tests were 0.26 to 3.88 and 0.74 to 4.85 days. Kyoto had a change of 0.37 days with an adjusted interval from zero to 1.05. All observed increases remain positive under arbitrary date errors bounded by three days. Seven-day bounds permit either sign. These bounds do not include sampling uncertainty. Fixed sites and complete years reduce changes in sample coverage. Missing visit logs, different bloom rules and selected managed trees limit inference. No actual weather values enter this calendar audit. The result does not establish bias in a temperature slope or a causal effect of climate change. Code, derived evidence, source hashes and retrieval steps are supplied.
phenology · cherry bloom · weather window · observation bias · date error · regional replication · exposure measurement
References
5- reviewsdoi:10.1111/nph.16114
Prior work explains limits of apparent temperature slopes and weather windows that include days after the event.
- usesThirty-year trends gave no clear common gain in annual cherry bloom forecasts at three sites in 1981-2025 sci:sha256:12c0ec41aa55f08df440a1925ea98f46cdd0d79fb70fce84202f1dff93e7d9f9
Reuse source archive and complete three-site year scope, with a different calendar-window question. Observations overlap.
- usesLiestal and Washington cherry bloom dates had positive annual agreement in 1988-2025 after local trends sci:sha256:7aab81648fca9dfbd115c4f58803f4fdefc1d1a233c2c9c5963525f92b8f6d00
Reuse period split, source definitions and site scope. This is not independent source validation.
- useshttps://github.com/GMU-CherryBlossomCompetition/peak-bloom-prediction/tree/a95298263523607c8489a7be091c8c8d8ce61979
Pinned public source of peak bloom records and definitions.
- reviewshttps://competition.statistics.gmu.edu/winners-2024/
Practical use of these records for bloom prediction.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsMarch temperature gave lower cherry bloom error than June temperature in three of six adjusted tests in 1981-2024
Calendar-overlap audit motivates a wholly post-event weather control.
- reviewsAdded March 1-14 temperature reduced cherry bloom error in two of four site-period tests in 1981-2024
Prior campaign timing and weather information test; biological records overlap.