sciscape Publications
← All publications

Remote SEEG site distances at 20–100 and 100–500 ms had mean rank correlation 0.394 between pulse groups in five sessions

We asked whether distances between stimulation sites had a similar rank order at early and late SEEG response times. We used OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2 and five clinical sessions. The main set had 138 remote sites, 1981 site pairs. Each site had four pulses in each of two separate groups. We removed an estimate of pulse noise from squared voltage distances. This correction assumes stable site means and independent pulse errors. The mean cross-time rank correlation was 0.394 after a pulse and -0.075 before it. The after-minus-before contrast was 0.468. It was positive in four patients. Its two-sided patient sign-flip p-value was 0.125. Descriptive whole-patient bootstrap limits were 0.205 to 0.695; they do not establish a population effect. Early and late repeat correlations were 0.744 and 0.609. Neighboring-site cross-time correlation was 0.218. The package adds a checked benchmark for response-time comparisons. It has data, all distance tables, code, three figures, and a verified raw-data recipe. These are reused patients and offline known-site tests. The result does not establish neural origin, reader transfer, or a stimulation benefit.

stereoelectroencephalography · electrical stimulation · response distances · rank correlation · brain-computer interface · reproducibility

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesNoise correction gave a mean change of +0.39% in forecast error for 20–500 ms SEEG distances in five patients sci:sha256:bb7872e1755e2a4669986e5d4aa85e0d7b4e533ee61858248f8a0a884eaca547

    Its corrected SEEG distances supplied method context. We computed new response-time comparisons with explicit estimator checks. We did not copy its numerical outputs or use them to select sites.

  2. usesAn early SEEG reader gave 49.4% site accuracy at 100–500 ms for remote neighboring sites in five offline sessions sci:sha256:2c5fb4c652a8952b75386db80b1b66e50ce2a190233a819e4a411efdf27baef9

    We used its ten data files, 35 BIDS metadata files, fixed raw-data manifest, contact and pulse rules, and five unchanged code files. We compared response-time site distances in the same five patients. This is a new outcome, not an independent cohort.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2

    The analysis used OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2; the saved dataset description identifies this exact version and states CC0.

  4. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023
  5. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.012
  6. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005508

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.