sciscape Publications
← All publications

Extra weight on past falls cut lower 5% Nikkei 225 return forecast loss by 1.7% in a 2015–2025 archive test

We tested whether a fixed extra response to past price falls improves lower 5% daily return forecasts for the Nikkei 225 index. The rule was fixed before scores were calculated. Each forecast used ALFRED inputs dated at least two calendar days before its target. The primary test had 2,674 exchange sessions in 2015–2025 with input age at most seven days. Extra weight on falls reduced mean quantile loss by 1.69% against the same symmetric filter. The paired 95% block interval was 0.51% to 2.95%. The absolute gain was 0.257 basis-point score units, with interval 0.073 to 0.469. All-age and block-length checks kept a positive gain. Gains were negative in three years, and 2020 and 2025 supplied 66.2% of the net gain. The current calendar removed 50 priced source dates marked as closed. First-common-release and latest outcomes gave the same scores. The study extends a prior Nasdaq test; it introduces no new estimator. It tests one index and a known historical period with a reconstructed calendar. It does not establish profitable trading or future prediction skill. The package preserves code, source requests and hashes, all forecasts, aggregate scores, uncertainty draws, figures and checks. A full repeat matched 15 numerical and check files byte for byte. Restricted outcome ledgers are retained separately under provider terms.

Nikkei 225 · quantile forecasts · point-in-time data · external market test · asymmetric volatility · filtered historical simulation

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

4
  1. supportsExtra weight on past falls cut 5% Nasdaq Composite tail forecast loss by 1.1% in 2015–2025 with a two-day input cutoff sci:sha256:31b0a8b00f45fe3341bbdc1456bad373997c39805ebd67fe6d01a9378374576a

    We test its fixed sign-response filter in an external market. Its positive 5% Nasdaq result motivated this test. The periods share global shocks.

  2. usesVolatility scaling cut lower 5% return forecast loss by 8.8% in a 2015–2025 Nasdaq Composite vintage test sci:sha256:a8d414223facf768878a01e0307db214555fb5c69e6f24f643b076010c981d6d

    Its dated-input forecast design motivates the source timing audit. No source prices or analysis code are copied from this publication.

  3. usesdoi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x

    Prior method allows positive and negative returns to affect volatility differently. We use a fixed exponential sign response, not its fitted GARCH-M estimator.

  4. usesdoi:10.21314/jor.1998.001

    Volatility updating within historical simulation is the established forecast approach.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.