Colder winter minimum temperatures did not decrease the next-year growth of mountain pine beetle tree-mortality area in four western US regions, 1999-2025
Question: do cold winter extremes decrease the next-year growth of mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) tree-mortality area when survey effort, outbreak size and host depletion are controlled? Approach: we wrote the plan before we opened the data. We gridded USFS Insect and Disease Detection Survey maps (1997-2025; Regions 1, 2, 4 and 6) onto 0.5-degree cells and used only cells with at least 25% survey-footprint cover in both years. We compared log growth of mortality area from survey year t to t+1 with the coldest daily minimum (CPC Tmin) of the brood winter, with cell and region-by-year fixed effects, outbreak size, the previous five years of mortality, and CRU summer rain and heat. Intervals come from a bootstrap over survey years. Result: in 3,986 cell-year pairs (378 region-cells, 26 year pairs), a 10 C colder winter minimum changed log growth by +0.007 (95% interval -0.283 to +0.208). This excludes a halving of growth. The coefficient was negative in only 2 of 4 regions and in 1 of 2 periods. A lead-winter placebo (+0.030) was as large as the test winter, and a threshold model (minimum at or below -30 C) gave +0.039 (-0.309 to +0.329). Spruce budworm, a negative control, also gave no clear effect. The model detected density dependence and host depletion. A secondary term for October-November cold was negative (-0.45; -0.90 to -0.01), but it was positive in one region and its placebo was also negative, so it is only a hypothesis. Limitations: gridded air temperature is not phloem temperature; aerial survey methods changed; the test covers year-to-year variation, not the long-term release of outbreaks into formerly cold places. Code, plan, derived grids, results and figures are bundled; CRU data stay external.
References
7- supportsdoi:10.1007/s10980-015-0170-z
- doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.02.007
- doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06847.x
- doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.051
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3
- useshttps://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/data-tools-products/fhp-mapping-reporting/detection-surveys
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.cpc.globaltemp.html
Cited by
8 publications- Sea-temperature effects on recruitment of 282 RAM Legacy stocks rarely replicated, as weak constant effects predict, and gave no forecast gain; later effects diverged toward losses at warm range edges
- In NPAFC catches for 1997-2025, warm PDO years did not raise Alaska salmon catch and the Alaska-WOC inverse pattern stopped; only the negative PDO link of WOC coho held as a forecast
- Temperature relations fitted before 2005 forecast 2005-2024 Swiss spring plant dates well, British butterfly flight dates weakly and butterfly population growth no better than shuffled climate uses
- Stock-specific warming effects on fish surplus production from Free et al. (2019) changed with RAM Legacy v4.66 assessment revisions and did not improve one-step forecasts of later years in 91 stocks
- Early-period temperature models forecast later spring timing of Swiss plants and UK butterflies, but gave no forecast gain for UK butterfly or eastern US bird abundance (1951-2025) supports
- A 2001-2019 dengue temperature curve gave half the possible 2020-2024 forecast gain in Brazilian municipalities, but its 20-26 C slope rose from near 0 to 0.8-1.0 per C after 2012
- May PDSI kept forecasting prairie ponds and within-year duck settling in 1997-2026, but the 1998 duck equation under-predicted north-central US ducks by 73% as the US-wide drought response weakened
- Published drought and immunity models of US West Nile neuroinvasive disease fitted to 1999-2013 did not forecast 24 state counts in 2014-2025 better than simple baselines