sciscape Publications

Early winter temperature cut Great Lakes ice prediction error in a frozen 2011-2026 test

0 citing publications

We tested whether a winter temperature response retained prediction skill in five Great Lakes. Separate linear models fitted to 1973-2010 were held fixed for 2011-2026. November-December temperature reduced equal-lake mean squared error by 38.10% against the prior ten-year mean. Conditional 95% three-year block limits were 14.11% to 52.62%. A correction for three early information windows retained a positive interval. November alone gave no clear gain. November-January temperature gave 60.82% gain. Full November-February temperature gave 74.41%, but most ice peaks were already past; this is a diagnostic, not a forecast. A recent-only 2019-2026 check did not resolve the November-December gain. A conditional error budget states the weather precision needed under independent unbiased errors. Revised inputs, unknown release delays, coarse temperature boxes, 16 shared test winters and absent current-ice controls prevent a claim of verified operational skill. Code, aggregate evidence, source hashes, uncertainty draws and retrieval steps are supplied. External records remain outside the package.

Great Lakes · ice cover · temperature · forward test · forecast information · chronological validation

References

9
  1. usesPublished Lake Erie climate rules had mixed test skill in 2021-2024, and a revised bloom record changed their errors
  2. usesdoi:10.1175/2011JCLI4066.1
  3. usesdoi:10.25923/88c9-hm22
  4. usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
  5. useshttps://www.glerl.noaa.gov/data/ice/glicd/dates_AMIC.txt
  6. useshttps://downloads.psl.noaa.gov/Datasets/ghcncams/air.mon.mean.nc
  7. useshttps://www.glerl.noaa.gov/data/ice/
  8. useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
  9. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/about/faq.html

Cited by

0 publications

No incoming citations on Sciscape.