Exploratory held-out two-component PCA checks gave 80.7% mean rejection of digitally doubled SEEG waveforms at 20–500 ms after five fit pulses in eight patients
We tested SEEG response checks with public OpenNeuro ds004696 v1.0.1 data from eight patients. The sample had 86 stimulation sites and 886 remote bipolar readout instances. Five early pulses fit each check. Five later pulses tested it at 20 to 500 ms. Rates give equal weight to patients and sites within each patient. PCA means principal component analysis. A frozen two-component fit accepted 8.8% of later responses; a symmetric common fit rank accepted 82.3%. This rank accepted 96.0% after simulated double waveform gain. An exploratory follow-up scored each of six responses against a fit to the other five. It accepted 81.8% of unchanged responses and rejected 80.7% after double gain, an added rejection of 62.5 percentage points (descriptive 95% patient interval 57.4 to 68.2). It accepted 86.2% after half gain. The follow-up used the original test cohort. Rank guarantees require exchangeability, which was not established. Numerical inputs, results, source hashes, and figures are retained. GPL analysis and extraction scripts are omitted, so the package cannot replay the calculations from the upstream links alone. The study does not test live BCI control or natural faults.
stereoelectroencephalography · principal component analysis · conformal prediction · residual rank · signal gain · brain-computer interfaces
References
5- usesA fixed variance scale reduced normalized 20 to 500 ms SEEG forecast error against the full five-pulse mean in eight epilepsy sessions sci:sha256:0f8b222032deb58ef0ce9d5e487333a64f0b0a4c1eef619eae57985f9f0603f0
This work supplied the checked pulse inner products, native voltage examples, source records, and extraction code. We used them to compare three PCA residual checks.
- usesTwo components showed 0.35 percentage points more ordering gain after stimulation in eight patients, with an interval spanning zero sci:sha256:60b41d599f79c26125d90d87f3fd618324c7acd30ea7a4eccd34c3ae90a6f275
This earlier component study in the same cohort informed the choice of a two-component waveform model. Our residual checks do not add independent patients.
- usesA joint rank check accepted 83.2 percent of later SEEG responses at 20 to 500 ms in eight patients after five calibration pulses sci:sha256:293b34e71ea8d2f99a69e38b3c7c5227f6549f67906ebb9986851394508c542b
This earlier rank study in the same cohort informed the six-response rank comparison. Our component residual and gain tests use the same patients.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analysis used processed SEEG voltage derivatives from OpenNeuro ds004696 v1.0.1.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
Background source study describing the stimulation recordings and limbic network responses.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.