sciscape Publications
← All publications

TESS eclipse-like dips of 116 of 240 Gaia DR3 SB1 systems with M2min < 0.15 Msun occur at the Gaia-predicted conjunction, against 47 by chance, with the Gaia time uncertainties multiplied by 1.85

We tested whether Gaia DR3 single-lined spectroscopic (SB1) orbits of stars with low-mass companions predict the times of TESS eclipses. We selected 10,108 Gaia DR3 SB1 and SB1C orbits with a minimum companion mass M2min < 0.15 Msun, 0.3 d < P < 30 d and Tmag < 13.5. A box least-squares search of the TESS-SPOC and QLP light curves of 4,007 targets ran before the comparison with Gaia. A detection matches if its conjunction time at the Gaia epoch 2016.0 is within 3 sigma of the Gaia prediction. With 386 known TESS eclipsing binaries, we found that the formal Gaia uncertainty of this time is too small by a factor of 1.85. 240 eclipse-like detections have an informative prediction. 116 of these match, and chance gives 47.2 (Poisson p = 2e-17). At the opposite conjunction, 40 match, which is the chance level. Thus the excess occurs when the companion is in front of the star. The excess stays when we replace this factor with the factors of a mixture model that separates the Gaia and TESS ephemeris errors. The method found 16 of 20 known eclipsing binaries in the sample. 83 eclipse-like matches are not in the TOI list or in the main eclipsing-binary catalogues, and 36 pass our vetting. For 14 of the 36 vetted candidates we found no earlier detection, and 14 have only a pipeline detection (TCE). A mixture model gives that about 11 of the 36 vetted matches occur by chance, thus each candidate needs radial velocities. An independent TESS ellipsoidal test (sci:sha256:be44296e576666e16eee60eb46d7ed9988006cb8fa86ff89aef7a169b6946693) tested 22 of the vetted candidates and ruled out none. We fitted 33 vetted candidates with the TESS light curve, the Gaia orbit and the Gaia FLAME primary. 22 fits pass a density and radius check that we defined after the fits. These companions have 104 to 157 MJup and the radii of low-mass stars, thus they are very-low-mass stars, not brown dwarfs. For TIC 220568520 b, our mass (104 MJup) and radius (1.29 RJup) agree with the published radial-velocity values within 1 sigma. The only vetted candidate with a brown-dwarf minimum mass, TIC 450075744, has a fitted radius that is too small for its mass. The package contains the code, the derived tables, the MCMC chains and the reproduction instructions.

Gaia DR3 · spectroscopic binaries · SB1 orbits · TESS · eclipsing binaries · transits · brown dwarfs · very-low-mass stars · hydrogen-burning limit · conjunction time · uncertainty calibration · box least squares · brown-dwarf desert · M dwarfs · occultation

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

24
  1. supportsGaia DR3 astrometric-orbit cos i uncertainties are too small by a factor of 1.9 (68%: 1.6-2.35; s=1 rejected, p=1e-4) for 18 eclipsing binaries, if the eclipses limit |cos i| to (R1+R2)/r sci:sha256:8fff9d8d1a44cb9c781ceb7c1cc670f749e4218b62d0ef05ea30abd3c77552f6

    That work found that Gaia DR3 astrometric-orbit uncertainties are too small (factor 1.92 for cos i, about 1.8 for conjunction times). We found that the Gaia DR3 SB1 conjunction-time uncertainties are also too small: by 1.53 in a mixture model with 386 known TESS eclipsing binaries, and by 1.34 with a separate scale for the TESS ephemeris error.

  2. supportsGaia DR3 SB1 orbits predict eclipse times with errors 1.45 times too small and 2.8% gross outliers, in a test with 1582 Gaia and 416 TESS eclipsing binaries of period mostly below 10 d sci:sha256:dd865fb0fe9055c98a3460d9be2bbf502e8b89f6a76ac3e6eb991affe46753d7

    That work calibrated the Gaia DR3 SB1 conjunction times. For our 386 calibration systems, our predicted times agree with theirs (median phase difference -4e-05). Our Gaia-only scale for e < 0.03, 1.04, agrees with their 1.08 from independent Gaia eclipsing binaries, and our TESS-epoch scale 1.55 agrees with their 1.49 for the same systems.

  3. supportsTESS photometry shows that under 1% of Gaia DR3 SB1 orbits at 0.25-0.3 d and 2.6-6% at 0.3-0.5 d are real, for dwarf hosts, minimum companion mass below 0.15 Msun and ellipsoidal model scale 0.22-1 sci:sha256:be44296e576666e16eee60eb46d7ed9988006cb8fa86ff89aef7a169b6946693

    That work tested the same type of Gaia DR3 SB1 orbits for TESS ellipsoidal variation. It rules out none of the 22 vetted candidates that are in both samples. In the orbits that it rules out, our timing matches occur at the chance rate (2 against 1.97). In the orbits where it detects the signal, 136 match against 53.0 by chance.

  4. doi:10.5281/zenodo.22998328

    Prior TESS search at the conjunctions of Gaia DR3 SB1 orbits. We compare the method and the period range.

  5. doi:10.5281/zenodo.23342415

    Prior TESS search at the conjunctions of Gaia DR3 astrometric orbits. It also reports that the eclipse times scatter more than the Gaia uncertainties.

  6. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940
  7. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243782
  8. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac324a
  9. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467
  10. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad0135
  11. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.12380
  12. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3041
  13. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ade2d8
  14. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1745
  15. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aba526
  16. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481
  17. doi:10.17909/t9-wpz1-8s54
  18. doi:10.17909/t9-r086-e880
  19. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020802
  20. doi:10.1086/670067
  21. doi:10.1086/683602
  22. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1435
  23. doi:10.1086/589737
  24. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141489

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.