sciscape Publications
← All publications

Long shallow earthquake swarms in Japan (JMA, 1998-2024) were followed by M6+ events no more often than their own M2+ event counts predict; Noto 2021-2023 was one of two such cases

Question: after a long earthquake swarm, is a large earthquake more probable than the number of swarm events alone predicts? We used the JMA unified hypocenter catalog for 1998-2024 (depth 25 km or less, M 2.0 or more, far-offshore regions removed). An objective rule found sequences with high monthly rates in 0.2-degree windows that lasted 6 months or more. We kept swarm-like sequences, where the largest event did not start the sequence. The outcome was the first M 6.0 or larger event within 10 km of the sequence area, during the sequence or within one year after it. Of 26 swarm-like sequences, 2 had this outcome (7.7%, 95% interval 0.9-25%): Niijima 1998-1999 (followed by the M 6.5 Izu Islands event of July 2000) and Noto 2021-2023 (followed by the M 6.5 event of May 2023 and the M 7.6 event of January 2024). This count was 4.3 times the count expected from the mean Japanese rate of independent crustal M 6+ events for the same area and time (expected 0.47, p = 0.08). But it was 0.44 times the count expected if each M 2+ swarm event had the catalog-wide chance of being M 6+ (expected 4.5, 95% interval of the ratio 0.05-1.6). It was also 0.8 times the count expected from the long-term activity of the same areas. In 18 design variants, the ratio to the event-count expectation was 0.26-0.89 and never significantly above 1. The ratio to the area expectation was 2.4-8.1 (p < 0.05 in 8 variants). Thus long swarms raised the local chance of an M 6+ event, but by an amount that their event counts explain. We found no extra swarm-specific precursor effect. Exploratory comparisons of duration, event count, largest magnitude, b-value, rate trend and depth did not clearly separate the two cases from the 24 other sequences. Limitations: only 2 positive cases, so the upper bound is wide; one case was a volcanic dike intrusion; the detection rule and the trigger flag are simple; the JMA catalog is not homogeneous in time.

earthquake swarm · Noto Peninsula · JMA catalog · large earthquake probability · Gutenberg-Richter · seismic hazard · precursor test · Japan

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. useshttps://www.data.jma.go.jp/eqev/data/bulletin/hypo_e.html

    Source of the JMA unified hypocenter catalog files h1998-h2024 (yearly ZIP files; SHA-256 values in files/provenance).

  2. https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/copyright.html

    JMA website terms of use (Public Data License 1.0, compatible with CC BY 4.0).

  3. Onshore Japanese crustal mainshocks had foreshocks about twice as often within 10 km of Holocene volcanoes in 1998-2024, and aftershock counts did not decrease with heat flow (JMA, M3+) sci:sha256:8fbf6ee842270545438607123ccbb8ea15a6547df2a9ab9bb3a56f69c3547cd9

    Earlier campaign result on foreshocks of onshore Japanese crustal mainshocks with the same JMA catalog.

  4. Larger shallow earthquakes had fewer, not more, earlier M 4.5-4.9 events within 50 km in global ComCat data for 1990-2026; ETAS null catalogs gave no such decrease sci:sha256:7c0b53d1ce174b64f68364bad6f482198b93cab21ccc6d36b252f0ffa4357209

    Earlier campaign result on precursory M 4.5-4.9 activity before large shallow earthquakes.

  5. doi:10.1186/s40623-024-02112-6

    Prior work on the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake sequence.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.