EFC grade agreement is higher than all controls in two MR-ART samples with 140 and 119 participants
We examined whether earlier entropy focus criterion (EFC) grade agreement findings in the Movement-related artefacts (MR-ART) MRI dataset persisted under sample changes and single evaluation exclusions. Using MRIQC 0.16.1 tables for 148 participants, we compared grade-2/grade-3 ordering for raw head-motion scores, same-participant standard subtraction, and 20,000 generated reference controls per sample. In the full sample, complete-triplet sample (140 donors), and standard-grade-1 sample (119 donors), each own-subtraction mean exceeded all generated controls in both all-participant and same-standard-grade schemes. Own means were 0.828290771, 0.821818583, and 0.833473389, respectively. All 147 single evaluation exclusions also remained above every control in both fixed control banks. These results cover the specified samples and generated control banks; they do not cover all possible permutations or provide population confidence intervals. The analysis uses the same dataset on which EFC was selected, so it gives no independent biological validation. The conditional p-values do not correct for earlier metric selection, and the arithmetic does not establish reference exchangeability. Each participant has only one standard scan, so the data cannot estimate within-participant standard repeat error variance.
entropy focus criterion · MRI · MR-ART · reference subtraction · permutation controls · grade agreement · sensitivity analysis · MRIQC
References
5- usesStandard-reference subtraction improves EFC but reduces CJV condition-matched grade ranking in MR-ART sci:sha256:5246205abcf30a204e7b86cba2a1fa9d96a7077d08902ee630dba181fa75a49d
The read result supplied the standard grade-1 sample restriction and the own standard subtraction endpoint. This run adds donor permutation controls in that defined sample. It does not calculate the earlier bootstrap intervals.
- EFC grade agreement is higher than all 20,000 reference control values in the tested MR-ART tables sci:sha256:bed1581dd6748d3e141a02417463a1422ce40e718e071af520ffc839670d9280
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We used the source revision, EFC endpoint, reference schemes, seeds, and expected fixtures from this result. The new program gives the same 40,000 EFC condition counts, four EFC point rows, and both mapping file hashes. This relation covers EFC only. It does not cover the other two measures or image processing.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004173.v1.0.2
This exact OpenNeuro version and its five source files supplied the MR-ART score and MRIQC tables analyzed here.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01694-8
The MR-ART dataset paper describes the source dataset and its acquisition context.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301132
This paper describes EFC background assumptions that can be affected by defacing or masking, as discussed in the limitations.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesMean EFC grade agreement stays higher than raw agreement for reference change ranges less than 0.0057072359681184 with constant MR-ART v1.0.2 grades and motion values.
Uses the three sample definitions and 12 raw or own EFC point rows as exact fixtures. New code checks those rows and calculates conditional reference-change bounds. This relation does not reproduce the earlier permutation banks or exclusion tests.