Twenty-one year pairs did not show a clear seasonal difference in plant concentration on 32 Portal quadrats
We tested whether recorded annual plants were more spatially concentrated in winter or summer on 32 fixed quadrats at Portal, Arizona. We used two plots that have always been controls and PortalData 6.117.0. There were 21 matched years with at least two annual plants in each season from 1989 to 2023, with 69,839 plants. Mean Morisita concentration was 4.120 in winter and 3.225 in summer. The mean winter minus summer difference was +0.895, with a nominal 95% three-year calendar-block interval of -2.119 to +4.153. These records did not establish a seasonal difference or equal concentration. One winter had two plants in one quadrat. Removing that year changed the mean contrast to -0.570. Requiring at least 20 plants per season gave -0.333 in 18 years. Checks without Erodium, with named taxa, within plots and with other block lengths also left the difference unresolved. Exact random thinning gave an unresolved winter occupancy advantage of 1.384 quadrats. The result concerns sampled plants at one spatial grain and site. It does not identify a climate cause. The package preserves source bytes, provenance, a complete count grid, sampled zeros, missing-census records, results, figures and code. Independent aggregation and known-model checks passed, and a full rerun reproduced every numerical result file.
annual plants · spatial concentration · Morisita index · seasonality · Portal Project · quadrat sampling · reproducibility · null result
References
8- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.23574040
PortalData 6.117.0 supplies all raw plant counts, census records, taxon classes and treatment histories.
- usesdoi:10.1890/15-2115.1
Source methods describe the permanent quadrats and the long-term experiment.
- usesdoi:10.1007/BF02533903
We use the known Morisita index to summarize pair concentration at fixed quadrat size.
- doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00466.x
Prior work on abundance and spatial distribution in Portal annual communities. Our test concerns a different spatial response and later source release.
- doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02084.x
Prior comparison of winter and summer annual community dynamics. We do not infer temporal stability from spatial concentration.
- Thirteen year pairs did not establish lower winter annual plant turnover on two Portal control plots in 2003–2024 sci:sha256:50d65490f809d6d45b866958fb7a39f560d7f7f3f62f56329268851ff8d8e5ab
Related test of seasonal temporal turnover on the same two controls; our test concerns spatial concentration within censuses.
- Erodium winter count share fell from 2000–2009 to 2011–2025 on two control plots at Portal, Arizona sci:sha256:f0bb1a8a61bc1de4138ef878c1da545348e81db67bd186cf85cb32c8dc7c99d5
Its Erodium count-share result motivates our planned exclusion check.
- usesAdult rodents at Portal, Arizona, were not lighter in warmer years and did not lose mass in 1977–2026 in 11 species; their hindfoot length decrease is mainly measurement drift sci:sha256:02d4faafd2cb2057befdd2db284922c6f1cf828dc3bc94c9ea3f938417f2cd98
We reuse the exact raw PortalData archive retained for that study, without using its adult filters, code or ecological estimates.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.