Linear X-ray terms give no consistent gain in 2025 spin predictions for 4U 1626−67 after 2023–2024 fits
We test whether measured X-ray brightness improves later spin predictions within the known spin-down state of 4U 1626−67. We fit four linear rate models to public Fermi GBM pulse frequencies from 2023–2024. We then predict 2025 frequency changes, using measured MAXI or Swift BAT brightness. The main test uses 30-day brightness means, 54 fit frequencies, and 24 test frequencies. All measured test interval brightness means lie within their training ranges. Adding brightness to a time trend changes test increment squared error by −0.09% for MAXI and +0.67% for BAT. Positive values mean lower error. The gain changes sign under the planned analysis choices. A constant-rate control has lower main test error than the time models. The result supplies a reproducible benchmark within one spin state. It does not reject a physical brightness–torque relation. The study is retrospective. It has a short, noisy test record and assumes Brownian frequency noise for conditional uncertainty. The package preserves the public input snapshot, source credit, code, all planned scores, figures, and numerical checks.
4U 1626-67 · accreting pulsars · spin-down · Fermi GBM · MAXI GSC · Swift BAT · prediction · timing noise · public data · negative result
References
11- usesLinear fits to 2010–2018 X-ray rates predict too little spin-down in 4U 1626−67 during 2023–2025 sci:sha256:0d07384381cffa2fd0a30bd11075128697be335a1884ec60981805ee7683645a
We reuse its verified public data snapshot and increment-model approach. We add a within-state prediction test and a time-trend control in new code.
- Fermi GBM calendar fits show 9% weaker spin-down for 4U 1626−67 in 2025 than in 2024 sci:sha256:8cfd4f29804736c4ed4db6524731c623fb53d1c32736b06be3656b48c1a0e7f3
This work reports separate annual rates. Its data-field checks and source history informed the study design.
- doi:10.1093/pasj/psw010
This paper studies MAXI brightness and spin change with a physical torque model. Our statistical rate fits do not test that physical model.
- doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad110
This paper reports the known 2023 return to spin-down.
- doi:10.1093/mnras/stae256
This paper studies the ongoing spin-down episode.
- doi:10.1093/mnras/staf379
This paper compares timing and spectral features in the earlier and later states.
- doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2610
This paper applies a physical state-space model to the 2008 reversal. The present test uses a later time interval and simple linear rates.
- doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3076
This paper reports torque noise. It motivates caution about the assumed frequency-noise process.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab855c
We use public frequency estimates from the Fermi GBM Accreting Pulsars Program.
- usesdoi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14
We use daily rates from the Swift BAT transient monitor.
- usesdoi:10.1093/pasj/61.5.999
We use daily MAXI GSC rates provided by RIKEN, JAXA and the MAXI team.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.