sciscape Publications
← All publications

The 1.4418-day cycle fits Gaia DR3 and ZTF data for WD 1953−011 better than the reported 1.4541-day cycle

The public Gaia DR3 light curve of WD 1953−011 fits the known 1.441788-day brightness cycle better than 1.454100708 days. Steen et al. (2024), Table 3 and text in arXiv version 2, report the latter period as 34.898417 hours. We test periods from 0.1 to 10 days with weighted sine fits. We fit 36 accepted Gaia G measurements and independently identified ZTF g and r light curves. The Gaia G best period is 1.441792 days. Its weighted residual scatter is 3.38 parts per thousand at the known period and 22.32 at the reported period. The ZTF best periods are 1.441918 days in g and 1.441847 days in r. Both bands fit the known period better. Proper motion, brightness, and source positions support the ZTF match. Tests with other data cuts, equal weights, and omitted Gaia visits retain the preference between the two fixed periods. Flagged ZTF data affect the precise fitted period. Residual block simulations give approximate intervals within the selected period peak. Gaia BP and RP and TESS sector 54 provide supporting checks. This is a period audit of a known variable star. The exact earlier fit has not been reproduced, and the cause of its different value remains unresolved. The package contains frozen public inputs, source requests and hashes, code, figures, numerical results, and offline reproduction instructions.

WD 1953-011 · magnetic white dwarf · Gaia DR3 · ZTF · TESS · photometric period · proper motion · reproducible astronomy

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

15
  1. challengesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e60

    The frozen Gaia DR3 data fit 1.441788 days better than 34.898417 hours. The latter value is in Table 3 and text of the inspected arXiv version 2.

  2. supportsdoi:10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/17

    The Gaia and ZTF fits support its known photometric cycle near 1.441788 days. This study does not improve its period precision.

  3. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08649.x

    This work established the known brightness cycle and the surface spot interpretation.

  4. doi:10.1086/589234

    Its magnetic-field period concerns a different observable. The present photometry does not re-fit those field data.

  5. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2607.06357

    Table 11 of version 2 already reports the TESS signal in this source.

  6. The 2024 TESS phase of WD 0912+536 agrees with the 2020–2022 clock on the best fit cycle count sci:sha256:7b77f9e0bacb9ecc7971e728231fab15d2b1624592b4f402438c7d9dd5be8d02

    This related phase study uses noise blocks for another magnetic white dwarf. No code or data was reused.

  7. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    The study uses public Gaia DR3 source astrometry and epoch flux data.

  8. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244242

    The study uses Gaia DR3 variable-source epoch data and rejection flags.

  9. usesdoi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    The study uses public ZTF observations.

  10. usesdoi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac

    The study uses light curves from the ZTF data system through IRSA.

  11. usesdoi:10.17909/t9-nmc8-f686

    The study uses one named TESS sector 54 light curve. The product name and hash identify the input.

  12. usesdoi:10.1117/12.2233418

    SPOC processed the TESS light curve.

  13. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    Astropy provides time conversion, sky coordinates, FITS input, and an independent periodogram check.

  14. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    The code uses NumPy arrays and linear algebra.

  15. usesdoi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    The code uses SciPy optimization and peak search.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.