sciscape Publications
← All publications

Current rest subtraction gave no clear log loss gain in eight offline SEEG key readers after task changes with 64 calibration trials

We tested whether earlier rest power improves SEEG prediction of the response key after a task condition change. We used public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2 data from eight patients. Each reader used 64 early trials for calibration. Pair selection, scaling, and penalty selection used early trials only. The next condition had 979 test trials. Mean log loss was 0.7212 nats for raw pre-response power and 0.7187 nats for pre-response power minus current rest power. The paired gain was 0.0024 nats. The 95% whole-patient bootstrap interval was -0.0227 to +0.0389 nats. Gain was positive in three patients. Both main readers had higher mean loss than a constant probability of 0.5. A secondary past-rest mean gave a larger gain, but one patient accounted for most of it. The results do not establish a useful gain or equivalent methods. This is an exploratory offline reading test. It uses eventual response time and complete responding trials. It has no stimulation outcome. The package preserves features, raw signal audit ranges, all predictions, model states, figures, source hashes, and retrieval code.

stereoelectroencephalography · brain-computer interface · response-key prediction · log loss · rest subtraction · calibration

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesPast rest subtraction gave 58.5% mean balanced accuracy compared with 61.2% for spectral contrasts in an offline state test on eight SEEG recordings with 32 fit trials sci:sha256:41d7d9d6d32730470ad1cc926d848e08d89def4afc076ad1c82c8825145b7f7e

    The earlier state-label rest subtraction test motivates the present feature comparison. The present target is the response key, and its input eligibility uses the corrected cohort. The two tests have different scopes.

  2. usesEight SEEG key readers gave 53.4 percent mean balanced accuracy after condition changes with 32 calibration trials sci:sha256:b9d997feb12a06acbb687e7dfcfe304892654f63871ce3f774503880b6647dbe

    This study uses the corrected eight-patient input cohort, source feature arrays, recognized-key joins, and retrieval code. It tests rest subtraction and forward penalty selection with key probability loss.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2

    The analysis uses OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2 data from eight patients.

  4. doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.