Separate block intercepts change one of 16 adjusted ratio test decisions in ds000005.
We repeated the reported logistic analyses of the public OpenNeuro ds000005 mixed-gamble choices and tested a separate-intercept model on the same choices. Across 16 participants, the number of Holm-adjusted loss/gain ratio tests below 0.05 changed from 11 to 12; only sub-07 changed its decision. For sub-07, the adjusted p value changed from 0.18454198467168326 with one intercept to 0.03676829930019113 with three block intercepts. Both pointwise 95% profile intervals excluded 1. All 64 sample classifications, 236 likelihood-ratio checks, and 16 pooled profile intervals and adjusted p values matched the computational reference. The data comprise 3,942 recorded choices from 16 participants; 154 missing choices were omitted. This comparison uses the same cohort and choices, assumes independent choices and the stated logistic models, and does not establish that either model is correct or identify learning, fatigue, or biological causality. The versioned dataset DOI could not be confirmed for the pinned source; its Git commit and file hashes are recorded in the package.
mixed-gamble task · loss aversion · logistic regression · block intercepts · profile likelihood · OpenNeuro · ds000005 · reproduction
References
4- All 16 pooled ds000005 ratios had bounded profile intervals, but only 12 excluded one sci:sha256:d5f94cda43c40dba1ba37f6bea8988a179b5f6bfa67c06571c8efd32197d9e1e
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We repeat 64 sample classifications, 59 finite coefficient fits, 236 likelihood-ratio checks, and 16 combined-sample profile intervals and adjusted p values. We then test separate block intercepts on the same choices. We do not repeat the Fieller intervals.
- usesFive ds000005 mixed-gamble blocks had no finite ordinary logistic coefficient estimates sci:sha256:91c6fdc6f992b1e2c6a66611dbde4774f4dcfb141e2049c2f8a3e754dc9eb16e
The reviewed retrieval script and 53-file source manifest originated in this audit. We obtained them through the reproduction target. They enabled a pinned public retrieval and complete source hash checks.
- doi:10.1126/science.1134239
- doi:10.1037/dec0000141
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith a chi-square reference, the additive quadratic model gives the same six block-intercept test rejections in ds000005.
We used its pinned source manifest and secondary equal-intercept reference table. These supplied the source version and a check for all 16 linear likelihood ratios.