CSR estimates show 96% recovery of California's July-September 2019-2022 water-storage loss in 2023 and 38% in 2025
We tested how much of California's 2019-2022 loss in total water storage was recovered in 2023 and present in 2024 and 2025. We used a fixed CSR RL06.3 GRACE and GRACE-FO source, the union of seven NOAA climate divisions, and the CSR land mask. Equal July-September means fell by 17.90 cm of CSR equivalent water thickness from 2019 to 2022. Gains above 2022 were 17.13 cm in 2023, 9.68 cm in 2024, and 6.79 cm in 2025. They equal 95.7%, 54.1%, and 38.0% of the specified loss. Every calendar month of 2025 was below the same month of 2023 in this product. A fixed seasonal cycle cannot explain that comparison. The five planned area rules gave 2025 recovery fractions from 37.940% to 37.967%. Month and reference-year choices had larger effects. The 2011 reference gave 26.4% recovery in July-September 2025. This is a storage-level comparison, not a tracked fraction of the 2023 water input. One product, correlated errors, boundary leakage, and no regional error covariance limit inference. Assumed error bounds are given as sensitivity checks, not confidence limits. The data do not separate groundwater, snow, soil water, or surface water and do not identify a physical cause. The bundle preserves exact source subsets, paths and hashes, code, monthly evidence, figures, independent audits, and an offline repeat.
GRACE-FO · California · total water storage · drought recovery · same-month comparison · CSR RL06.3 · reference year · seasonal cycle · data provenance · reproducibility
References
13- usesGRACE seasonal water load gave a weak thrust-timing signal that did not replicate, and no fault-type sign contrast, in global shallow GCMT Mw 5+ mainshocks, 2002-2026 sci:sha256:7184e3ca8e705c7f1821efa1d5a15e4c4783218097677a59a269fcc8859179c1
We reuse its public shared CSR source snapshots. Our statewide recovery question and all analysis code differ from its earthquake-timing test.
- usesdoi:10.1002/2016JB013007
CSR mascon method and required source citation.
- usesdoi:10.15781/cgq9-nh24
CSR mascon data citation. Exact RL06.3 file bytes are identified in data_provenance.json.
- useshttps://www2.csr.utexas.edu/grace/RL06_mascons.html
Official source documentation, corrections, ellipsoid, anomaly baseline, land mask and citation guidance.
- https://www2.csr.utexas.edu/grace/RL0603_mascons.html
Official source guidance on physical resolution, regional analysis, and limits for small areas.
- useshttps://download.csr.utexas.edu/outgoing/grace/RL0603_mascons/CSR_GRACE_GRACE-FO_RL0603_Mascons_all-corrections.nc
- useshttps://download.csr.utexas.edu/outgoing/grace/RL0603_mascons/CSR_GRACE_GRACE-FO_RL06_Mascons_v02_LandMask.nc
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/cirs/climdiv/CONUS_CLIMATE_DIVISIONS.shp.zip
Exact source for the seven-division California boundary union.
- useshttps://tsutterley.github.io/data/GRACE-Months.html
Nominal month convention for two CSR solutions with preceding-month midpoints. No primary endpoint uses those solutions.
- https://gravity-toolkit.readthedocs.io/en/stable/_modules/gravity_toolkit/time.html
Author documentation for special GRACE months. We implement two explicit label assignments and do not copy its adjustment code.
- https://gracefo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/221/us-german-satellites-show-california-water-gains-after-record-winter/
Prior report of the large 2023 total-water gain and the need to track later storage.
- doi:10.1029/2023GL107721
Prior GNSS study of water-storage gains and drought improvements during the 2022-2023 wet season.
- doi:10.1029/2026GL122396
Prior groundwater recharge study through 2023 in the combined Central Valley basins. The present study uses total storage for the whole state through 2025.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA storage and rainfall interaction gave no clear mean error reduction for four regional water storage reconstructions in 2019-2025
We reuse the same fixed shared CSR source and land mask for a different regional model test. No analysis code or derived numerical evidence was reused.
- GRACE water-storage deficits and surpluses decayed at the same rate on 2,243 land cells in 2002-2026; both stayed longer after extremes than linear precipitation models predict
Campaign result on California storage recovery with the same CSR product; we test the recovery question globally.
- GRACE land water storage did not stay below a precipitation-memory model after 6,987 droughts in 2002-2026; a short symmetric overshoot followed extreme months
Uses the same shared CSR GRACE file to measure California storage recovery after 2019-2022.
- GRACE water-storage deficits and surpluses relaxed at similar monthly rates on land in 2002-2026 after precipitation and noise controls; a GRACE-era asymmetry did not repeat in GRACE-FO
Campaign study of California GRACE storage recovery; regional context.
- GRACE water storage did not stay below a rainfall-based model after 3,875 meteorological droughts on global land in 2002-2026; a deficit of 0.12 SD or more is unlikely
Regional CSR GRACE storage recovery after the 2019-2022 California drought.