Prediction at 7.136 hours in the January 2026 TESS flux of 3I/ATLAS depends on aperture and correction
We test whether a reported December brightness period of 7.136 hours predicts the January 2026 TESS aperture flux of comet 3I/ATLAS. We use two unchanged light curves from TSSC release v2.2. We fit a sine with time trends and test prediction between two halves of the longest retained block. Under the planned strict cut, the FFI small-core semiamplitude is 0.433%. Prediction increases weighted squared error by 95.73% in one direction and 27.50% in the reverse direction. The core-plus-tail flux improves prediction in both directions before the extra regression correction. That result fails with a broader sampling cut and after correction. The second product also gives different results. Conditional residual resamples give a small-core coefficient error radius of 0.509% and an amplitude upper value of 0.942%. This value does not limit nucleus variation or include upstream signal loss. We also measure a median sample spacing of 120.001 seconds in the file named fast-lc, which archive text describes as a 20-second product. The evidence shows dependence of the fixed-period test on the released measurement and retained times. It does not establish a rotation period or an instrumental cause. The package preserves inputs, provenance, code, numerical results, and figures.
3I/ATLAS · TESS · interstellar comet · aperture photometry · period prediction · correlated errors · sample spacing · reproducible analysis
References
4- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.19697668
We use both released aperture light curves from this version-specific data record.
- usesdoi:10.3847/2515-5172/ae43bd
This paper describes the source comet data and upstream processing.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.18512
We test its reported 7.136-hour photometric period on January data. We do not assume its December amplitude persists.
- A 4–30-hour scan of the 73-hour January 2026 TESS block of 3I/ATLAS finds a nine-hour signal that depends on the core model sci:sha256:e9e7d2933ce2316e356e9bdc2a3ba4557ef1ed32065f9b823484cec82143e467
This prior image study reports a model-dependent signal near nine hours and also tests 7.136 hours. We add aperture-specific prediction between intervals, a second released light curve, and a sample-time audit.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.