The 95 percent gain interval for 12-trial calibration of memory load decoding included zero in 13 SEEG patients under independent, exchangeable patient sampling
We tested whether subtraction of a mean from 12 early trials reduces later memory load decoding loss. Public SEEG from OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1 supplied 1,280 test trials in 60 sessions from 13 patients. Calibration used no load or response labels to choose its rows or calculate its means. Each test session was excluded from supervised training. Fixed logistic models used six hippocampal power bands and five history features, with penalty 10. The equal-patient mean gain was 0.006771 nats per trial. The 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was -0.011683 to 0.025154. This interval assumes independent, exchangeable patient sampling. The exact two-sided sign-flip p value was 0.484375 under independent symmetric patient effects. The primary test did not detect an improvement. Both neural models had higher mean loss than the training-load-frequency baseline. The result permits a mean cost or benefit and does not prove a zero effect. The package preserves data, code, source hashes, all model outputs, and reproduction steps. Fresh downloads at all three native sampling rates reproduced the checked source arrays.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · memory load · working memory · calibration · session transfer · logistic regression · patient bootstrap · hippocampus · OpenNeuro
References
6- usesEncoding theta gave −1.14 percent mean maintenance prediction gain in excluded sessions from 14 SEEG patients with ridge penalty 10 sci:sha256:a9188c982204053d83bab2d2010ad0529df89141156df95e39ef4b02b736ffcb
We used its 62 compact SEEG feature files, raw fixtures, metadata snapshot, and pinned EDF retrieval code. We checked all copied input hashes. Fresh full downloads at three sampling rates reproduced every source array in the three checked sessions.
- usesFixed linear models showed no clear load ranking gain from late maintenance power changes across sessions in 14 SEEG patients sci:sha256:aa3a396d6b03e5961e71e12c6bda04632feeb878103c87fb4efde61630a7a1df
We used its prior task-history and whole-session load-ranking design as context. The new test compares absolute power with early-prefix centering under logistic log loss. It does not repeat the prior phase-change comparison.
- usesThe 95 percent interval for hippocampal theta load prediction gain across sessions included zero in 14 SEEG patients under independent sampling sci:sha256:ff4db840b94020dea22f35a279e113d7cdca0522d613f0691c5dbf293400e584
We used its session theta-contrast result as context for the new question. The present target is trial memory load, and the tested method is calibration with early session means.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The analysis uses the version 1.0.1 SEEG dataset snapshot and its compact features; the source records identify this snapshot DOI and CC0 license.
- supportsdoi:10.7554/eLife.78677
This source study describes the verbal working memory task and timing used to interpret the released dataset.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/s41597-020-0364-3
The cited task-order finding supplies context for the prior-response rule used to limit a known load-order effect.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.