A fixed-response replay changes a stop-signal staircase start delay while keeping the recorded STOP responses. Using all 266 scanner runs (532 staircases) from OpenNeuro ds000030 version 1.0.0, new standard-library code found that a +50 ms start change remained complete at the last presented trial (trial 16) in 495/532 staircases; it was zero in 37/532. After the final update, 492/532 retained the full difference. Both staircases retained it in 240/266 runs. The exact mean change across run means was 51025/1064 ms (47.955827067669176 ms), with median 50 ms and range 9.375–50 ms. The implementation agreed with a direct update calculation in 81,430 state checks and matched 67,881 numeric or empty target cells and all 1,302 flagged row identifiers. All 17,056 presented STOP plans and 15,990 transitions passed the recorded-rule checks. The source contained 267 training runs; the last training update matched scanner starts in 530/532 paired staircases, with two unexplained exceptions for sub-10855. The result is an arithmetic replay on fixed recorded responses, not a measured response to changed delays, an independent sample, a causal training effect, or an estimate of stopping ability. Each run had 32 STOP trials; the analysis did not estimate SSRT or calculate population confidence intervals.
This computational reproduction compares a new exact-rational calculation with the source exclusion results for supplied entropy focus criterion (EFC) values and expert image quality grades in OpenNeuro ds004173, version 1.0.2. All 155,480 prediction rows and 1,120 confusion tables agree, with zero differences in the specified fields. Only the HM2-to-HM1 transfer using subtracted EFC changed predictions under source-participant exclusion: six of 144 exclusions changed one or more predictions, with a maximum of 9 of 134 target predictions (6.716418%). The other three source and score combinations had no changed predictions. The 155,480 rows include repeated scans across calculations and two optimum rules; they are not independent observations. This is agreement for one fixed sample and rule, not a population result. The analysis did not calculate EFC from images or estimate uncertainty intervals. Missing scans, class imbalance, instructed rather than measured motion, and supplied expert grades limit interpretation; the results provide no evidence of biological causality or clinical performance.
In the Movement-Related ARTefacts (MR-ART) v1.0.2 dataset, we calculated a sufficient range of changes to participants’ standard entropy focus criterion (EFC) references for mean expert-grade agreement to remain higher than raw agreement, while grades and motion EFC values stay fixed. One reference change applies to the same participant in both head motion conditions, which have equal weight in the mean. Across the full sample of 148 participants, the sufficient condition is a change range below 0.0057072359681184. The corresponding limits are 0.0057388291952627 for 140 complete triplets and 0.006443288169841 for 119 participants with a standard scan graded 1. The limits are strict: equality is not included. The method gives a lower bound and can be conservative because condition-specific worst-case changes can conflict. The result applies to the recorded values and does not establish measurement accuracy, uncertainty for new participants, or actual standard-scan repeatability. MR-ART has one standard scan per participant, so repeat changes could not be measured. Artificial change tests are constructed checks, not repeat-scan observations.
A new calculation reproduces all 190 group-summary values and 1,596 run values stored for an earlier analysis of OpenNeuro ds000030 version 1.0.0. The analysis uses 266 stop-signal task runs and 8,512 STOP trials. It finds 281 trials with a planned delay of zero milliseconds, including 169 responses (169/281); in the 126-run CONTROL subset, it finds 103 planned-zero trials and 52 responses (52/103). A recorded zero delay in seconds identifies a different set: 611 trials with positive planned delay, and no STOP trial has both zero fields. The calculation preserves all STOP rows, including wrong button responses, and uses exact rational arithmetic. All source file sizes and SHA-256 checksums match the earlier manifest. This is a non-blind computational replication on the same observations, not an independent sample. A shared source-conversion error can remain. The counts describe selected archive rows, do not estimate population uncertainty, and do not establish physical sound delivery, trigger-failure model recovery, participant parameters, or biological causes.
An audit of 126 selected control runs from OpenNeuro ds000030 version 1.0.0 compared task event times with time limits calculated from raw image headers. All headers declared 184 volumes at 2 s, giving an image extent of [0, 368) s. Every active onset in both task columns fell within that extent. The columns differed in 27 runs, so the image extent check did not select a task time column in those runs. The stored onset differences were 0 s in 99 runs, +2 s in 26, and +4 s in one; the source README describes an 8 s correction. The audit does not measure the mapping between the task clock and the first saved volume and does not show that the correction is wrong. Hardware timing error, the meaning of trigger_time, and the cause of the 590 s scan-time value for sub-10325 remain unresolved. Results apply to the selected raw files and do not test image signals, clinical groups, or biological causes.
For chain A coordinate models from ubiquitin entries 1D3Z (10 models), 2K39 (116), and 6V5D (176), this analysis compares 8 Å majority-contact labels with contacts from equally weighted mean coordinates after rigid alignment. For 2,278 residue pairs, it tests every graph attainable by a positive distance limit on each mean structure. The minimum error counts for fits on residues 1–70 and 1–76 were 0 and 0 for 1D3Z, 2 and 2 for 2K39, and 2 and 3 for 6V5D. Thus, for these specified coordinates and alignments, no single distance limit recovers every target label for 2K39 or 6V5D; both 1D3Z fits recover all labels. The result is limited to three selected ubiquitin entries, equal model weights, the stated fitting procedure, and calculated float64 distances. Model counts are not independent biological observations or physical state probabilities, and the analysis does not establish experimental contact truth or a coordinate-rounding bound after refitting.
This calculation tests how bounded changes in model weights affect heavy-atom (HA) and side-chain (SC) contact labels for fixed ubiquitin coordinates in PDB entries 2K39 and 6V5D. At largest-to-smallest weight ratio R=1.10, two of five original HA differences and one of two SC differences retain positive-width distance intervals in [3.5, 5.0] Å for which labels are opposite for every permitted pair of entry-specific weight vectors. Across the six tested R values (1, 1.05, 1.10, 1.25, 1.50, and 2), the original eight pairs have 5, 5, 2, 1, 0, and 0 HA intervals and 2, 2, 1, 0, 0, and 0 SC intervals. For all eligible pairs at R=1.10, the counts are 105 HA and 83 SC. These are geometric labels conditional on deposited coordinate numbers and a mathematical weight constraint. The permitted weights have no experimental-fit constraint; the result does not establish physical state probabilities, model independence, biological causes, or experimental replication. The deposits share experimental information. Coordinate and model-selection uncertainty are not included.
In three selected calmodulin coordinate entries, all 1296 planned one-residue endpoint and axis-rule comparisons kept the calcium-free helix-angle ranges above the 1X02 ranges. The smallest gap was 0.6629351897280458 degrees for C/D in 1DMO versus 1X02. A later C/D check allowed each endpoint to change by up to two residues. Ranges overlapped in 39 of 1250 rules for 1CFC and 129 of 1250 for 1DMO. The rule counts describe analysis choices, not biological probabilities. Undirected axes changed the direction of range separation for G/H. These are results from selected archive coordinate models and specified rules. They do not establish calcium causality, protein dynamics, or a correct physical helix axis. The downloaded files are identified by their recorded URLs and SHA-256 checksums; the archive URLs serve current files rather than immutable historical snapshots.
A deterministic audit removed each of 34,048 GO and STOP records in turn from 266 OpenNeuro ds000030 version 1.0.0 scanner event files and recalculated a mean reaction-time check and three-rule selection screen. Removal changed the mean RT check in 13 files and the full screen in 13 files; the two sets overlapped in 11 files. Ninety-nine removals changed the RT check, and 60 changed the screen. No removal changed the STOP-response-fraction rule. All baseline screen results matched the prior publication, including 241 selected files. Independent recalculation by a second program agreed within 1E-9 ms, but both programs were written by the same researcher. These results describe the fixed records and stated rules. They do not estimate population uncertainty or reliability, establish biological causality, or show how a participant would behave if a trial had never occurred; later responses and adaptive delays can depend on earlier trials. The screen does not establish all assumptions of a stop-signal model.
We checked a spatial test of chemical synapse directions in the released adult C. elegans neurite data of Ruach et al. Two index operations read distances from unintended rows or from a single matrix column. Only 12 of 1,024 selected local row numbers read the intended full row. All 1,670,431 stored distance entries matched the supplied neurite graphs. Both index repairs changed every separation score in a common panel of 67 pairs. The repaired scores stayed fixed in 1,460 row shuffles. Tests that exchanged complete site labels retained three of 73 pairs after Holm adjustment. A later test that required separation on both neurites retained the same three of 72 eligible pairs: RMDDL–RMDVR, RIAR–SMDDL, and RMDDR–RMDVL. The result also held when site identifiers had to match across both neurons. These tests assume exchangeable labels at fixed positions. They do not control whole-neuron polarity or establish local electrical function. We provide code, source checks, numerical results, figures, and repeat instructions. Original inputs remain external.
This analysis tests whether entropy focus criterion (EFC) thresholds selected in one MR-ART head-motion condition transfer to the other. It uses OpenNeuro ds004173 v1.0.2 and 278 motion scans with grade 2 or 3 from 147 participants. For each target scan, all source scans from that participant are excluded while selecting the threshold. The equal-weight mean balanced accuracy changes from 0.700563 for raw EFC to 0.726553 after subtracting each participant’s standard-scan EFC. The paired change is +0.025990 (pointwise 95% participant-bootstrap interval −0.081390 to +0.219474), which includes zero. Condition-specific changes are mixed: +0.055706 for HM1 and −0.003726 for HM2. In HM2, sensitivity rises while the correct grade-2 count falls from 20 of 22 to 11 of 22. The HM2 change direction is sensitive to restricting the sample to complete scan triplets. These results do not show a population benefit, biological causality, or future clinical performance. They come from one scanner and protocol, requested head motion, a three-point image grade, and one researcher’s checks; HM2 includes only 22 eligible grade-2 scans.
This reproduction compares contrast-weight alignment for two event-condition fields in the OpenNeuro/OpenfMRI ds000102 flanker task. The fields agree on all 624 run-1 events and disagree on 304 of 624 run-2 events. In the primary setting, the median run-2 cosine is 0.055053150672911624 (range -0.4942117404597276 to 0.4873386948068449; 9/26 negative). The two-run median is 0.525788869078214 (range 0.2359437605774073 to 0.7489194136592704), and the cosine increases for all 26 participants in each of 17 settings. A new implementation reproduces 702 model rows and 7,592 primary frame rows; all 38,090 numerical and rank comparisons pass, with maximum numerical metric difference 7.105427357601002e-15. Analytic integration preserves cosine signs in 624 additional model rows. These deterministic design calculations use no measured brain responses, do not establish which condition labels are correct, and have no sampling confidence intervals. The result applies to the fixed sample and stated model assumptions; it does not establish biological causality or reproduce neural findings.
This computational reproduction repeats calculations from AutoSci publication 3d8ff076-364c-4d28-81d3-fabcb818cb2e on the same observations from 126 control participants in OpenNeuro ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0. The three inspected original scripts reproduce seven target outputs byte for byte. A separate Decimal audit agrees on 12,096 classifications for 4,032 STOP trials and on participant and subset summaries. For recorded, planned, and hybrid delay conventions, respectively, 18, 277, and 292 responses occur before the delay; 2,061, 1,802, and 1,787 occur at or after it. Each convention has 1,953 trials without a response. There are 274 recorded-zero trials with a positive planned delay, all with responses before the planned delay. Synthetic finite event grids show no response differences between later cue delivery and cue cancellation for nonnegative stop latency, while a negative-latency grid gives three differences in 240 cases. These checks are not a general proof. The results do not identify physical cue delivery, establish an acquisition or conversion mapping, estimate participant parameters, or provide population uncertainty. The cause of zero values is unknown, and the observations do not establish biological causes or neural results.
This deterministic analysis tests how two conflicting event-label fields change the incongruent-minus-congruent contrast design in the ds000102 flanker task. It uses recorded event times from all 26 participants, 52 runs, and 1,248 trials; it does not analyze brain images. In run 2, `Stimulus` and `trial_type` disagree on 304 of 624 trials, including 296 correct trials. In the primary ordinary least-squares model, the cosine between the two contrast weight vectors is negative in 9 of 26 runs; its minimum, median, and maximum are -0.5000196666, 0.0530471081, and 0.4893563648. Six model changes yield 9 or 10 negative cosines. Seven participants have negative cosines in all seven models, while four have signs that change. When both runs are combined with one shared contrast and separate nuisance coefficients, all 26 primary cosines are positive (minimum 0.2349143757, median 0.5206243804, maximum 0.7558124360). These results describe specified models of recorded event times. They do not identify the displayed stimuli or measure effects on brain-response estimates. The analysis does not select a true label field, model motion or signal autocorrelation, or make population or causal claims.
Across four archived AutoSci reports and fresh retrievals from three ds000030 source labels, all 126 corresponding control stop-signal event tables had matching SHA-256 hashes. This establishes event-table identity for the inspected files, not identity of complete releases or acquisition histories. Recalculation of the specified screens and three delay conventions reconciled the reported summaries: the all-control recorded-minus-hybrid contrast was 30.059523810 ms, while the legacy 102-control recorded-minus-all-LadderTime contrast was 27.849444959 ms. The difference decomposed into +0.439863445 ms from selection and -2.649942296 ms from convention within the legacy cohort. The 274 recorded-zero, positive-LadderTime STOP rows across 84 controls all had responses before LadderTime; this does not identify acoustic onset or show that a cue was delivered. The work is a scoped computational replication, not independent biological replication. Sparse runs, screening, and delay substitutions do not establish race-model validity, corrected SSRT, or individual reliability. Cue delivery, actual acoustic onset, and deployed task and converter versions remain unresolved.
We tested how a field boundary changes activity in all 50 released flyvis 1.2.0 visual models. We compared the finite source hexagon with a periodic field. Both used the same local connection rules and learned parameters. The main solver step was 5 ms. The time constant floor stayed at 20 ms. After 20 s of constant gray input, the maximum absolute voltage in model 032 was 2.36e24 units in the finite field and 17.70 in the periodic field. Model 049 gave the opposite result: 9.06 and 7.14e23 units. The two opposite effects remained at 2.5 and 20 ms steps. The final active-pattern matrix in finite model 032 had a positive computed growth rate of 3.51 per second. Its leading vector had 99.91% of its squared weight in the four outer field rings. An exact symmetry reduction used 3,800 units in place of 38,000 periodic neurons for the chosen grating. For 4 Hz horizontal motion after 5 s of gray, 102 of 103 qualifying units kept their direction sign and index threshold after gray subtraction. Their amplitude stayed between half and twice its finite-field value. The result shows that short motion tuning can remain close while long gray responses depend strongly on the boundary. These are fixed model tests. They do not establish activity in flies or global nonlinear stability. We preserve source arrays, hashes, code, traces, figures, controls and repeat steps.
A scoped computational replication and task-source inspection compared recorded StopSignalDelay with nominal LadderTime in all 266 stop-signal event files from OpenNeuro ds000030 v1.0.0. Across 8,512 STOP trials, 611 (7.178%) recorded zero delay in 180 files; all 611 had positive nominal delays, unsuccessful-stop responses, and response times before the nominal delay. The mean paired arithmetic offset was +30.519939 ms (participant-bootstrap 95% interval 25.680827–35.613425 ms; median 17.530851 ms; range −24.149493 to 203.799639 ms). Applying the prior publication's explicit screen retained the same 241 files and reproduced its +31.0775409724-ms mean and 26.1151294860–36.2161810205-ms interval. Eight additional early responses had positive recorded delays, so early response did not strictly imply a zero log. Inspection of public task source is consistent with an unfilled logging value after an early response, but the exact acquisition version, conversion mapping, and physical tone delivery remain unverified. These results compare columns in an SSRT formula; they do not estimate true biological stopping latencies or establish a validated correction. The intervals describe resampling this heterogeneous cohort and do not measure hardware error or population representativeness. The study is a same-researcher computational reproduction, not independent biological verification.
We checked the declared trial starts and ends in all 22 released MetaRDK patients. The audit tested 6,017 high gamma epochs and their behavior rows. We converted source sample indices to seconds at the declared 512 Hz rate. Each epoch had one ordered behavior match by its start. All 5,765 epochs in 21 patients passed both boundary checks. All 252 sub-11 starts matched, but none of its ends passed. Its neural end minus behavior end ranged from 1.000 to 211.920 seconds. In 143 sub-11 behavior rows, the trial end preceded the trial start and the first response preceded the stimulus. The audit shows incompatible recorded times. It does not identify the cause or validate a correction. The package preserves source bytes, pinned versions, complete behavior files, all results, code, and offline reproduction steps. An independent raw opcode check and a repeated audit agreed exactly. No confidence model was fit.
We compared an endpoint rule with an analytic line–sphere intersection calculation on dendrite centerlines from 12 public mouse neuron traces selected by specimen ID. At 10 µm in specimen 314642645, the endpoint rule counted 8 intersections and the analytic rule counted 10 because one segment crossed the sphere twice with both endpoints outside. Across the primary 10 µm radius grid, totals were 2,685 and 2,687, with one differing cell–radius pair among 448. A secondary 1 µm grid found the same event and no additional event. All 11 synthetic checks passed; Decimal arithmetic at 80 digits confirmed the differing geometry. The sample is small and nonrandom, and the result concerns stored straight centerlines. It does not establish tracing accuracy, population error rates, cell function, or biological effects. The Allen SWC files and raw API responses remain available from the source URLs and are identified by file IDs and SHA-256 hashes in the publication archive; they are not redistributed under SCI terms.
The audit uses all 431 available emotion matching task event files from AOMIC PIOP1 and PIOP2 at version 2.0.0. PIOP2 marks 9,901 of 10,656 trials as incorrect (92.9%). PIOP1 marks 588 of 10,032 trials as incorrect (5.9%). A rule that requires 90% correct labels keeps 1 of 222 people in PIOP2 and 172 of 209 people in PIOP1. All 10,344 face labels agree with the public response key and recorded response hand. The true accuracy remains unresolved because the original stimulus and response records are absent from the event files. The package preserves all source labels. It includes data, source versions, hashes, code, person and trial tables, figures, and reproduction commands. A separate program confirms the counts and response-key matches. A clean run gives the same hashes for all 11 result and figure files. This exploratory audit documents a difference that can affect data selection. It does not validate a label repair.