Mean beta power decreased after stimulation and matched periods with no marked pulses in 113 hippocampal SEEG records from seven people
We tested beta power from 13 to 30 Hz in public hippocampal depth records from an implanted stimulator. The fixed source sample had 222 records from seven people. Of these, 197 records had enough time for a five-second measurement that started five seconds after the last marked pulse ended. We chose earlier periods without marked stimulation. Each control had the same measurement gap and similar pre-window beta power and absolute voltage change. Only 113 records met the planned match limit of one candidate standard deviation on each feature. Each person had equal weight. Mean beta power changed by -1.08 dB after stimulation and -1.41 dB after the matched control periods. The contrast was +0.34 dB, with a person bootstrap 95 percent interval from -0.29 to +1.15 dB. A beta decrease alone did not identify a stimulation response in this sample. Earlier controls were not random sham trials, and two people had only one and three matched records. The result does not establish or rule out a causal stimulation effect. The package contains raw data, source hashes and object versions, the local plan, control features, analysis code, three figures, and reproduction instructions. A separate reader agreed on all 8.1 million voltage samples. A separate run reproduced all six numerical result files exactly.
SEEG · hippocampus · beta power · brain stimulation · matched controls · signal change · intracranial EEG
References
3- usesA 20-second median correction reduced error for a 10 percent beta threshold target in saved SEEG records from seven people sci:sha256:0ab6c409a66046bcd1ce14f9afb3c5e51588bbaa620f40f8d19b1e8991247965
We used its fixed 222-record SEEG sample, raw EDFs and BIDS sidecars, selection table, pinned source hashes and S3 versions, EDF reader, table functions, and retrieval code. The new study tests post-stimulation changes against matched earlier periods without marked stimulation. The earlier study tested pre-stimulation threshold calibration.
- supportsdoi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1815732
The source data paper describes the device and records used here and supplies source context for the dataset and artifact guidance.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007095.v1.0.0
This exact CC0 dataset version supplied the recorded source files; the publication preserves the pinned hashes and retrieval metadata.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesObserved normalized 20 ms forecast error was lower after marked pulses in 59 matched hippocampal SEEG records from seven people
We adapted the control timing idea: copy the marked pulse span into an earlier period with no marked pulses. We used different pre matching features and a normalized voltage forecast outcome. The cohort is shared.
- usesA planned match rule retained 63 of 250 bilateral hippocampal SEEG records for a theta coupling test
This study adapts the retrieval code and earlier matched-control design. It reuses 189 raw records and the same seven source people. It adds a theta coupling endpoint, a coupling match feature, broader metadata selection, and timing audits.
- usesRelative beta power increased threshold error in three people and reduced error in four after five chronic SEEG calibration sessions
We retrieved its full archive of 222 EDF records and 666 sidecars. We reused its pinned sample and source manifest for a new relative beta threshold test. We checked the bytes against the public source again.