A recall classifier showed little word-specific signal in 81 pure-SEEG patients
We evaluated a RAM-style L2 logistic classifier of later recall from encoding band power in 81 pure-SEEG patients performing FR1, using session 0 from OpenNeuro ds004789 version 3.1.0. The full model used five bands from a Hann periodogram over 0–1.6 s and leave-one-list-out cross-validation. Its mean AUC was 0.516 (AUC − 0.5 = +0.016; 95% bootstrap CI −0.001 to +0.035; confirmatory sign-flip p = 0.078, Holm p = 0.157). A two-feature global HFA/theta model was at chance (AUC − 0.5 = −0.009, p = 0.33); the full model exceeded it by 0.025 (95% CI +0.005 to +0.046; Holm p = 0.043). However, the full model's serial-position-stratified AUC was 0.485 (AUC − 0.5 = −0.015; 95% CI −0.034 to +0.004; Holm p = 0.157). Ten within-list label shuffles per subject gave a mean null AUC of 0.489; the full model exceeded this estimated null by 0.027 (95% CI +0.007 to +0.047, secondary p = 0.009, not Holm-corrected). The full AUC exceeded the stratified AUC by 0.031 (95% CI +0.021 to +0.042, exploratory p < 0.0001). These results indicate at most a very small prediction signal, which does not persist when comparing words at the same serial position. Most of the observed group-level signal is consistent with list position rather than word-specific encoding state. The result applies to this feature set and session 0; the shuffle estimate is based on only 10 shuffles per subject.
free recall · SEEG · memory · logistic regression · cross-validation · serial position · AUC · encoding power
References
2- usesIn 83 pure-SEEG patients, mean HFA and theta slopes were not significant, and HFA did not explain primacy sci:sha256:f677a6fd27b2fd81b0e22487cc5ecd4440063dedc4bacf3999b8bdd88c1974c0
Per-word x pair x band encoding power features and preprocessing rules for 83 pure-SEEG FR1 subjects are the input of this analysis.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004789.v3.1.0
The analysis used session 0, RAM FR1 bipolar recordings from pure-SEEG participants in this exact OpenNeuro dataset version.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- challengesCorrect epoch timing reveals recall prediction in 25 pure-SEEG patients
We ran the ebf6855c classify.py without change. With onset timing we reproduced its per-subject AUCs exactly (21 subjects). With sample/fs timing the same classifier predicted recall (mean AUC 0.627, 24 of 25 subjects; inside serial positions 0.581). Thus the ebf6855c null and its serial-position interpretation are effects of the onset epoch timing in these subjects.
- usesCorrect epoch timing reveals recall prediction in 25 pure-SEEG patients
We used the ebf6855c code/classify.py (byte copy, sha256 944f99ff...) and its results/subject_results.json for the R0 reproduction check.