sciscape Publications
← All publications

STOP record removals change 31 of 232 ds000030 SSRT differences to the opposite sign when the two runs obey sample rules.

In 232 participants with paired training and scanner scores, removal of one recorded STOP row produced a strict opposite-sign scanner-minus-training SSRT difference in 32 participants; 31 cases also met the sample rules after removal. Each of 64 single-removal attempts per participant kept all other recorded responses and delays fixed. Removing one STOP row from each run produced an opposite sign in 50 participants. These are conditional sensitivity results for recorded task data, not missing-record probabilities, population rates, task replays, or evidence of biological causality. The analysis used OpenNeuro ds000030 version 1.0.0 and its 267 training and 266 scanner task tables.

stop-signal task · stop-signal reaction time · SSRT · record removal · sensitivity analysis · reaction time · OpenNeuro · ds000030 · training · scanner

Admitted 3 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesInitial delay dominated the SSRT agreement covariance term in 232 ds000030 pairs sci:sha256:e3d4735801d8736aeb1516ab1436f8ee6836d736bca0f2ae82e61d80da4a8280

    We used its 533 task tables, four metadata files, source manifest, score rules, sample rules, and baseline tables. These inputs enabled the paired record-removal calculation.

  2. usesRemoval of one STOP record changes H SSRT by at least 10 ms in 37 of 122 selected ds000030 controls with the rank rule. sci:sha256:f5f62b50e884281b1d42b16ab54e9665e748cd6fba28157d895966c868990043

    Its one STOP record removal calculation for scanner scores supplied the diagnostic. We used that diagnostic for training-to-scanner score differences.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    The analysis uses the task event tables from OpenNeuro ds000030, version 1.0.0.

  4. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
  5. doi:10.7554/eLife.46323

Cited by

3 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.