sciscape Publications
← All publications

Removal of one STOP record changes H SSRT by at least 10 ms in 37 of 122 selected ds000030 controls with the rank rule.

Removing one recorded STOP trial at a time from each of 126 OpenNeuro ds000030 version 1.0.0 control event tables changed calculated stop-signal reaction time (SSRT). In the primary fixed sample of 122 controls, using the integration method and nearest-rank rule, the median largest absolute change (M) was 7.538022 ms under the hybrid delay definition; 37/122 controls had M ≥10 ms and 2/122 had M ≥20 ms. Across recorded, hybrid, and ladder delay definitions, median M values were 10.480548, 7.538022, and 7.510974 ms. The thresholds are descriptive, not biological limits. With linear interpolation, hybrid median M was 6.827195 ms, and 25/122 controls had M ≥10 ms. With all 126 controls, hybrid median M was 7.749979 ms; the largest M was 95.882468 ms in a control whose GO omission fraction exceeded the primary limit. The positive recorded-minus-hybrid baseline difference exceeded hybrid M in 79/81 controls with a positive difference. These are fixed-record calculations: GO records, sample membership, and later adaptive delays stay unchanged. The removal ranges are not confidence intervals, repeat-session reliability, or biological uncertainty bounds. They do not simulate a task without the removed trial or establish race-model assumptions, tone delivery, or causality.

stop-signal task · stop-signal reaction time · SSRT · trial removal · integration method · nearest rank · OpenNeuro ds000030 · sensitivity analysis

Admitted 8 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesDeleting one recorded stop trial can shift omission-handling SSRT contrasts in two public tasks sci:sha256:7871765d2f7ee7cf0150a5ac2c3673edde726c38a891695a34a04b2b25710c76

    Its removal of each recorded STOP row supplied the diagnostic concept. This analysis uses that concept for absolute SSRT and the delay-definition difference in ds000030. No prior code or other dataset was used.

  2. usesShared ds000030 stop-signal files show that screening and delay conventions explain summary differences sci:sha256:4a0a20ce6ce7b45ad872195b2eeb2477c5732815382c9a9808761424bedf1d8a

    Its source archive and pinned source manifest enabled verification of the 126 event tables. Its table supplied 24 baseline fields per control for the executed agreement check.

  3. usesRecorded response correctness differs from stopping accuracy in ds000030 controls sci:sha256:9b3fcb076a7cf7af472ffb90250092828b37dc26aba2b60e9201ee1acb133d80

    Its response-code audit informed interpretation of the known unmapped button codes in sub-10527 and the labeled later sample check. No prior code or behavioral comparison result was used.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    The analysis uses 126 scanner event tables from this exact dataset version, identified by the pinned source manifest and matching dataset metadata.

  5. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
  6. doi:10.7554/eLife.46323
  7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00037

Cited by

8 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.