With source order assumed, fixed scores did not confirm shared previous heat effects in 110 EEG and 20 fMRI adults
We tested whether previous heat shifts a current neural score after current input and session context are fixed. Public EEG and fMRI studies supplied separate human cohorts. Original EEG logs recovered 5,414 and 5,532 unique trial indices at two visits. Adjacent retained rows often named the wrong preceding heat level. Development used 40 EEG adults and eight MRI adults. A local code lock preceded tests in 110 other EEG adults and 20 other MRI adults. Mean standardized history slopes were +0.0301 and -0.0102. Their 95% person Student intervals were [-0.0043,+0.0644] and [-0.0568,+0.0365]. Both current-heat readers passed their assay checks. The planned negative prediction failed the shared test. An opposite prediction, selected in development, also failed. Both Holm p values were 1. At the second EEG visit, 116 reserved people gave mean -0.0051 and interval [-0.0376,+0.0274]. This repeat uses the same cohort. Reader refitting left both main ranges across zero. An exact subsequence join, all candidate matches, source pins, code, controls, negative results, figures and repeat steps are supplied. One EEG sequence had no exact full match and remains excluded. MRI history depends on the given order. Input duration, source processing, missing trials and different cohorts limit scope. No shared neural history effect or cause was established.
pain · EEG · fMRI · stimulus history · event alignment · cross-modal generalization · negative result · reproducible research
References
11- usesWith fixed models, past reports reduced pain report error in 115 EEG adults and 20 fMRI adults; a shared neural gain was not confirmed sci:sha256:ea23a2dfa07130d856665342291585a790d53bf46a201ac9e90e6a1a8fbcf4a8
We reuse its permitted compact neural inputs and source records. We fit new readers and recover delivered EEG history from original event logs.
- usesNeural scores trained on heat level tracked adjusted pain reports in 115 EEG adults and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:23f65a3fa079f4037761d6eb145841339f455f2c424de8f10fe006c3c9f00216
Its heat-trained score approach motivated our current-heat assay check. We reuse no fitted weights or result as new evidence.
- doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.02.010
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003948
- doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/BS3YJ
- doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/Z2H86
- doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003571
- doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12795116.v1
- doi:10.7554/eLife.15166
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.074
- doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA fixed test did not confirm lower neural scores after heat level repetition in 106 EEG and 20 fMRI adults
We reuse verified inputs, exact EEG delivered-event joins, fixed heat readers and source records. The repetition indicator is a new endpoint.
- usesUnder source order, fixed neural heat scores had current report correlations above the neighbor mean in 100 EEG and 20 fMRI adults
We reuse the event-alignment method, reader preparation and credited original source audits.