Neural scores trained on heat level tracked adjusted pain reports in 115 EEG adults and 20 fMRI adults
We tested whether neural scores fitted to nominal heat level also track pain report variation within input levels. Public studies supplied separate EEG and fMRI cohorts. Development used 39 EEG adults and eight MRI adults. Pain reports did not fit weights or choose penalties. A local code and input lock preceded tests in 115 other EEG adults and 20 other MRI adults. After input-cell and order controls, mean within-person correlations were 0.213 and 0.117. Their 95% person bootstrap intervals were [0.172,0.254] and [0.060,0.173]. Correlations of changes between retained trials were 0.199 and 0.115, with intervals [0.158,0.239] and [0.055,0.178]. Both shared tests passed a two-claim Holm correction, P=0.000810 and 0.001092. Neighbor-input, feature, grid and spatial-mean checks kept positive mean relations. The fixed EEG reader also worked at a second visit. Yet person association strengths repeated weakly, with intervals that included zero. Simulated shared slow drift could pass the change test. Thus the test does not establish a unique fast process. The contribution is a fixed transfer benchmark and a measured relation in two modalities. It does not establish a common cause, pain specificity or clinical accuracy. Source selection, whole-record processing, separate cohorts and one study per modality limit scope. The package preserves compact permitted inputs, source versions and terms, code, local plans, all outcomes, figures and repeat steps.
pain · EEG · fMRI · cross-modal generalization · physical intensity · within-person variation · reproducibility
References
10- usesWith fixed models, past reports reduced pain report error in 115 EEG adults and 20 fMRI adults; a shared neural gain was not confirmed sci:sha256:ea23a2dfa07130d856665342291585a790d53bf46a201ac9e90e6a1a8fbcf4a8
We reuse the verified compact EEG features, MRI grids and source provenance. We fit new physical-target scores and test new endpoints. Its failed shared prediction-error test remains valid.
- usesdoi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003948
The EEG source study and prior evidence on within-person pain relations.
- usesdoi:10.17605/OSF.IO/BS3YJ
Public EEG source tables and processing functions. File versions and source terms are preserved.
- usesdoi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12795116.v1
The fixed version of the MRI trial-response source. Original volumes stay external; permitted grid derivatives are included.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.15166
- doi:10.1038/ncomms14211
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.074
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001620
- doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1204471
- doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
Cited by
11 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith source order assumed, fixed scores did not confirm shared previous heat effects in 110 EEG and 20 fMRI adults
Its heat-trained score approach motivated our current-heat assay check. We reuse no fitted weights or result as new evidence.
- usesExploratory record checks in 114 EEG and 87 fMRI adults gave positive heat rank covariance; three primary shared tests failed
It defined the source heat readers and fitting/test people.
- usesNeural scores had positive heat relations after linear report control in 115 EEG adults and 20 fMRI adults
We reuse its permitted compact neural inputs, fixed heat readers and MIT code. We test the reverse partial association and add a report-noise diagnostic.
- usesA fixed offset update did not pass a shared heat forecast test in 115 EEG and 20 fMRI adults
Intermediate source for compact data and reader preparation in the attributed source chain.
- usesA shared heat response variance rise was not confirmed in 115 EEG and 14 fMRI adults
We reuse permitted compact inputs and source pins for a new fixed trial-variance assay.
- usesAfter one heat score was removed, fixed pain readers failed a shared test in 119 EEG and 20 fMRI adults
Its heat-reader result motivates the added neural heat-score control. We do not reuse its fitted weights.
- usesFixed heat scores decreased with retained order in 115 EEG and 20 fMRI adults; resampling training subjects left the fMRI slope uncertain
We reuse its permitted compact inputs and fit new readers for a new fixed order test.
- supportsFixed report readers failed a shared pain reversal ranking test in 114 EEG adults and 20 fMRI adults
Prior adjusted report coupling and trial-change results motivate the difference between within-input association and inversion ranking.
- Fixed neural readers tracked pain reports across heat levels in 117 EEG and 20 fMRI adults; another MRI test failed
Prior heat-trained reader work motivates a different, single-intensity pain-report weight fit and transfer test.
- supportsUnder source order, fixed neural heat scores had current report correlations above the neighbor mean in 100 EEG and 20 fMRI adults
This work already found adjusted report and retained-row change correlations. We add an explicit adjacent-report contrast with delivered-event links and do not claim the first temporal pain association.
- usesWith fixed readers, mean heat contrast kept more than half its early size in 115 EEG and 19 fMRI adults; the joint drift test failed
Intermediate data/reader work in the reused source chain.